KALYANI MENON-SEN's Posts - Gender and Evaluation2024-03-28T22:55:41ZKALYANI MENON-SENhttps://gendereval.ning.com/profile/KALYANIMENONSENhttps://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2219379825?profile=RESIZE_48X48&width=48&height=48&crop=1%3A1https://gendereval.ning.com/profiles/blog/feed?user=20vgwfidearlt&xn_auth=noRandomista economics: A critique from Naila Kabeertag:gendereval.ning.com,2020-12-21:6606644:BlogPost:1383452020-12-21T11:00:00.000ZKALYANI MENON-SENhttps://gendereval.ning.com/profile/KALYANIMENONSEN
<p>Worth a read - Naila Kabeer's strong rebuttal of Esther Duflo's proposition that affirmative action for gender equality is distortionary and inefficient. Kabeer points to the "selective storytelling" that replicates familiar biases and constructs a narrative that is not borne out by experiences on the ground. …</p>
<p></p>
<p>Worth a read - Naila Kabeer's strong rebuttal of Esther Duflo's proposition that affirmative action for gender equality is distortionary and inefficient. Kabeer points to the "selective storytelling" that replicates familiar biases and constructs a narrative that is not borne out by experiences on the ground. </p>
<p><a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13545701.2020.1743338?scroll=top&needAccess=true">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13545701.2020.1743338?scroll=top&needAccess=true</a></p>Bringing a feminist lens to programme evaluationtag:gendereval.ning.com,2014-05-22:6606644:BlogPost:185452014-05-22T07:06:25.000ZKALYANI MENON-SENhttps://gendereval.ning.com/profile/KALYANIMENONSEN
<p>I'm just back from the latest in a series of workshops conducted by ISST as part of their "Engendering Policy Through Evaluation" project.</p>
<p>Much of the conversation at the workshop was around the notion of "feminist evaluation" and how it should be defined. Is "feminist evaluation" a distinct field of practice with its own precepts, principles, methods and tools? Or is it simply the application of fundamental feminist principles and tools of analysis into the practice of…</p>
<p>I'm just back from the latest in a series of workshops conducted by ISST as part of their "Engendering Policy Through Evaluation" project.</p>
<p>Much of the conversation at the workshop was around the notion of "feminist evaluation" and how it should be defined. Is "feminist evaluation" a distinct field of practice with its own precepts, principles, methods and tools? Or is it simply the application of fundamental feminist principles and tools of analysis into the practice of evaluation?</p>
<p>In this context, I am attaching a paper that reflects the second approach and might be of interest to some members of this community.</p>
<p>An intriguing dimension in this particular case is the fact that the programme being reviewed was developed by feminists and strongly embeds feminist principles in its framework, but is located within the government and struggles to deal with gendered institutional structures.</p>
<p>Comments are very welcome.</p>
<p>KALYANI</p>
<p></p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2236425662?profile=original">KMS BOOK CHAPTER SONGS OF CHANGE IN A MINOR KEY.pdf</a></p>
<p></p>