Monthly Corner
Claudy Vouhé shared GRB in local authorities (French)
Gender-Responsive Budgeting (GRB) shows that the development of a budget and budgetary choices are powerful levers in terms of gender equality. We share our lessons learned in the field: a 5-step method, concrete examples (culture, sport, subsidies, public procurement, etc.) and keys to success. An operational work to objectify the impact of public policies and budgets and make RHL accessible.
Anuradha Kapoor Shared Swayam Recent Published Study
This exploratory study foregrounds the largely invisible issue of natal family violence (NFV) in India, exploring its forms, prevalence, and deep, long-term impacts on women's lives. It challenges the myth of the natal home as a safe space and centres survivor voices and lived experiences. The findings expose systemic silences and institutional barriers to justice. It offers vital insights for policy reform, feminist praxis, and deeper societal reflection.
Research Workshop on School Violence Prevention and Response - BLOG POST
Blog post summarizing key findings from each presentation and highlighting the outstanding research of all participants
Tara Prasad Gnyawali - Narrative
My flashback to working with wildlife-affected communities living in a biological transboundary corridor in Bardiya, Nepal, where I spent my golden 15 years. This story reflects changes that demonstrate how a community's tolerance extends to coexistence, and that is only due to the well-integrated planning of Ecotourism opportunities for the community.
Mehreen Farooq - BLOG
Events
Vacancies
- We’re Hiring: National Evaluation Consultant – Bangladesh
UN Women is recruiting a National Evaluation Consultant (Bangladesh) to support the interim evaluation of the Joint Regional EmPower Programme (Phase II).
This is a great opportunity to work closely with the Evaluation Team Leader and contribute to generating credible, gender-responsive evidence that informs decision-making and strengthens programme impact.
📍 Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh (home-based with travel to project locations)
📅 Apply by: 24 February 2026, 5:00 PM
🔗 Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gar4ciRr
If you are passionate about feminist evaluation, gender equality, and rigorous evidence that drives change (or know someone who is) please apply or share within your networks.
- Seeking Senior Analyst - IPE Global
About the job
IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.
Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.
Role Overview
IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.
Research of, for, by the deaf - a model for community driven action
niiti consulting has been catalysing work in the social sector for more than a decade. Its sister organisation Questera Foundation was created with the specific purpose of enabling social change, through a ‘build-operate-transfer’ model of implementation. The intent is that people from diverse cultures are able to define their own development paradigm and fulfill their economic, social, cultural, and spiritual aspirations.
In the past 18 months last year, the team at Questera Foundation was on-boarded for a landmark, two year project (named ‘Hear a Million’) for the empowerment of deaf in India. (Most do not want to be referred to as ‘hearing impaired’ and we wish to honour their preference in this article too!). A significant mandate in the assignment was building actionable insights through action research.
The most interesting aspect of this action research is the close and immediate intertwining of on-ground initiatives by teams that handle operations and insights gleaned from robust research study. Hypotheses and ideas generated by the synthesis of data are quickly translated to experiments or pilots. Observations of these experiments feed into refinement of the approach. The figure captures the various steps and interplays in action research.
Source: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/An-action-research-cycle_fig1_3...;
This year, we decided that action research at ‘Hear a Million’ could evolve a step further, and include deaf individuals in the research process. Not just for one research project, but for two!
Ruchi, Co-founder, Questera Foundation and Ramya, Consultant and Researcher, niiti consulting, converse about this unique experience of theirs.
Ruchi: What do you think was the most visible difference in research studies conducted by members of the community?
Ramya: Definitely the ease and comfort of the participants. For one research study, we had focus group discussions as part of the study (on the theme - Experiences of deaf at workplaces). Even on Zoom, we the ‘hearing’ observers could see and sense how open and forthcoming the deaf participants were, with the deaf facilitators. It went beyond the fact that both the facilitator and the participants were using the same language (sign language). It was the underlying fact that the lived experiences were shared, and by the same extension, the facilitators could ‘get’ what the participants were narrating.
In fact, most of the discussions went on more than an hour beyond scheduled time. Nobody was restless or reluctant, they were eager to share.
Ruchi: It was an eye-opener for me to see the subtle differences the involvement of the deaf made to the research instruments.
Ramya: Yes, Ruchi. We noticed this difference while creating discussion guides for the focus group discussions. No matter how much one tries to walk in another’s shoes, there is a limitation. The members of the team who are hearing have not experienced language deprivation (an outcome of deaf children not being exposed to sign language in their formative years). Hence, when the deaf members of the research team suggested simplification of the language, it was a learning experience indeed - “Why use a difficult word when a simpler one would be enough?”
Ruchi: Another remarkable thing that I noticed was how the deaf team members drove inclusivity for the hearing team members!
Ramya: Oh yes! The situation was truly unique. For the second research project, we had focus group discussions with hearing parents of deaf children, to understand their lived experiences. The parents hailed from rural Karnataka and were familiar only with Kannada. The deaf facilitator was not satisfied that there were sign language interpreters who could speak Kannada. Some of the hearing team members did not understand Kannada. So how would they make sense of what was transpiring? She went the extra mile to deploy a volunteer who could voice in English what parents were saying in Kannada (while the sign language interpreter signed). This tangible demonstration of the importance of being inclusive was so heart-warming.
Ruchi: Needless to say, research when done by the community, is bound to be valued better, don’t you think?
Ramya: Certainly. For one, the deaf members of the team who were part of the research team would go on to anchor the ‘action’ elements of this action research. What better way will ownership come about?
Furthermore, the findings of these research studies, when shared with the larger deaf community in India at events, will ring true and strike a chord - certainly much more than if the research had not involved the deaf.
Ruchi: To sum up, truly, a case has been made for inclusive research, has it not?
Ramya: Yes, happy to say so!
Add a Comment
-
Comment by Rituu B Nanda on April 23, 2022 at 13:51
-
Hi Meena, thanks for sharing your team's excellent work. Who do you think owned the action research?
Here is a blog which may be of interest https://aea365.org/blog/aken-affiliate-week-on-inclusion-of-individ...
© 2026 Created by Rituu B Nanda.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Gender and Evaluation to add comments!
Join Gender and Evaluation