Monthly Corner

Astha Ramaiya [Co-author] Shared the Journal Article - Published in Child Abuse & Neglect, June 2026

A new systematic review published in Child Abuse & Neglect examined the link between mental health and technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse (TF-CSEA). Analysing 10 studies with over 25,000 participants across seven countries, researchers found that depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and prior trauma were consistently associated with victimisation. Crucially, the relationship appears bidirectional with mental health difficulties both preceding and resulting from exploitation; creating potential cycles of repeated harm. Perhaps most striking: traditional parental monitoring through technological surveillance showed limited protective effects. What actually mattered? The quality of parent-child relationships including, open communication, emotional warmth, and trust. The findings suggest prevention efforts should combine universal school-based programmes building emotional resilience with targeted support for high-risk youth, while parent education should prioritise connection over control. With 12.5% of children globally experiencing online solicitation annually, understanding these psychological pathways is essential for effective child protection.

Alok Srivastava, Vasanti Rao & Amita Puri Article on International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, January 2026

Tara Prasad Article on Challanges and Lessons Learns of GESI responsive and inclusive conservatiom practices, Nepal

Ritu Dewan & Swati Raju Article on Economic and Political Weekly

Viera Schioppetto shared Thesis on Gender Approach in Development Projects

Events

Vacancies

  • Seeking Senior Analyst - IPE Global

About the job

IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.

Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.

Role Overview

IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.

More Details Please go through

Members

Four steps to more gender-responsive evaluations

Marco Segone - Director, Independent Evaluation Office, at UN Women, the UN entity for gender equality and women's empowerment, and Co-Chair of the EvalPartners Initiative started a blog at World Bank IEG site on Four steps to more gender-responsive evaluations.

The challenge of mainstreaming gender-responsive evaluations in global organizations

Earlier this year in one of her weekly blogs IEG’s Director General Caroline Heider posed an important question: “How do we create the right incentives to ensure gender dimensions are included in our work?” My experience of mainstreaming gender in the United Nations system has convinced me four key issues must be addressed.

1. Strengthen an organizational enabling environment for gender equality.

In the case of the United Nations, the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) requested that work continue to enhance and accelerate gender mainstreaming including by fully implementing the United Nations System-wide Action Plan on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN SWAP).

2. Ensure strong vision and leadership by senior management.

The UN Secretary General, the UN Women Executive Director and the World Bank President are three strong advocates for gender equality. Inspired by their leadership, high-level discussions took place between the Evaluation Cooperation Group (ECG), a network of evaluators in multilateral banks; the United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG), which brings together evaluators in UN entities; and EvalNet, which links evaluators in OECD countries on how to integrate gender in evaluation in their own respective organizations.

3. Strengthen organizational capacities for gender equality

In the evaluation community this means strengthening gender-responsive evaluations.  Under the leadership of UN Women, UNEG recently developed the handbook on Integrating Human Rights and Gender Equality in Evaluation which integrates gender-responsive evaluation in training. UN Women, in partnership with UNEG and EvalPartners, is now developing an e-learning tool to be integrated in the EvalPartners’ Massive Online Open Course (MOOC) that has already attracted 20,000 registered participants from 178 countries.

4. Put in place an accountability and reporting system. 

The UN SWAP has 15 performance indicators for tracking six main elements on gender mainstreaming, including one dedicated to tracking how gender responsive are evaluations managed by UN entities. Progress (or lack of it) is reported annually to ECOSOC, ensuring a constant political demand for the mainstreaming of gender equality in the UN system.

The golden opportunity of the post-2015 agenda

The year 2015 will be a year of global transformation, in which the new Sustainable Development Goals will be framed. Ensuring gender equality will be central to achieving these goals.  

Evaluation must be equipped to inform its design and implementation, at both the global and national levels. National development policies and programmes should therefore be informed by evidence generated by credible national evaluation systems that are gender-responsive, while ensuring policy coherence.  The challenge is:  How can the global evaluation community ensure that evaluation shapes and contributes to the implementation of international, regional and national policies and programmes to achieve sustainable, gender-responsive and equitable development?

Gender-responsive evaluation: A global partnership

No single organization, regardless of how big, strategic or well-funded it is, can do it alone. The only way to address these challenges is through a global partnership. That’s why EvalPartners was launched two years ago.

EvalPartners, co-led by UN Women and the International Organization for Cooperation in Evaluation (IOCE), brings together evaluation and development practitioners in the UN system, multi-lateral banks, Civil Society Organizations, private foundations and governments to achieve a common goal.

Together with UNEG and the International Development Evaluation Association (IDEAS) EvalPartners launched a networked global multi-stakeholders consultative process to frame the future priorities of the global evaluation community, including how to integrate gender in international, national and regional evaluation policies and systems.

I would like to invite the World Bank Group as an institution, and each of you as committed professionals, to join the consultations and shape the future of a gender-responsive evaluation community.

Comments


Tessie Catsambas
Tuesday, September 9, 2014 - 15:28
It is so exciting to see the leadership of UN Women in this blog, which feels to me like a call to action for the evaluation community in building gender equality and equity issues in evaluation. Many international and national policies are emerging regarding gender equity, and the proof of their power will be in how we operationalize them. Do we pay lip service by filling out a checklist, or do we embed serious analysis on the gender dimension? Do we devote a "special chapter," or do we integrate it into every part of the evaluation process? Do we interview a few token women, or do we inconvenience ourselves and reach deeper into communities to understand underprivileged women's experiences, and the experiences of other groups whose lives are compromised by gender inequality? Side-by-side with global advocacy and action evidenced in Marco Segone's blog, we need to highlight local action and effective practices. National evaluation associations and societies have to showcase work that contributes to our deeper understanding of how to embed gender equality in our work, and show us why in matters. In October, in Denver, at the American Evaluation Association Conference, we are featuring a Presidential Strand panel entitled Violence Against Women: A Global Crisis and a Challenge for Evaluators. We, evaluators, needs to become more adept at conducting gender-responsive evaluations. In the South Asia Community of Evaluators, the Gender and Evaluation community, https://gendereval.ning.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network, hosts active and exciting conversations about local tools and practices. Let's work together to connect the dots of local action on gender equality across the world. Tessie Catsambas, IOCE Secretary, EvalPartners Executive Committee and Enabling Environment Task Force

Donna M Mertens
Thursday, September 11, 2014 - 10:36
I also applaud the important step UN Women is taking in this call to action. Building on the posting by Marco Segone and Tessie Catsambas' comments, I want to raise several interrelated points concerning the role of the evaluator, diversity within communities of women, and the need to challenge oppressive cultural beliefs and structural inequities. As a community, we need to give more thought to how we design evaluations that are supportive of the transformative change that we value. How do we interact with stakeholders throughout the continuum in ways that leave them better able to take action to create change through the use of evidence-based decision making in culturally respectful ways? How do we decide who to include and how to include them? If problems faced by women are to be solved, how do we use a gender-responsive lens for the inclusion of men as part of the solution? What are the dimensions of diversity within the community of women we are engaged with - particularly characteristics beyond gender that are used as a basis for oppression and discrimination? For example, how can we address the needs of women who have a disability or deaf women? What strategies are we using in our evaluations, what questions are we raising that bring attention to the need to be inclusive and not to further marginalize those who are at the most risk of being excluded and further oppressed? Given that there are oppressive cultural beliefs and structural inequities, how do we work together with communities to make these visible and to support the challenge that is needed in this regard? The resources presented in this thread of discussion are valuable in our search for answers to these questions. Sharing our experiences and strategies is also important.

The original blog posted on below link

http://ieg.worldbank.org/blog/four-steps-more-gender-responsive-eva...

Views: 366

▶ Reply to This

© 2026   Created by Rituu B Nanda.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service