Report on SLEvA Conference, Sri Lanka 23rd-24th July 2013

At the onset, I would like to thank the Institute of Social Studies Trust (ISST) and in particular, Ms. Shraddha Chigateri and Ms. Akansha Babbar for giving me an opportunity to attend the 4th International Conference by the Sri Lanka Evaluation Association (SLEvA). The main theme of the conference was “Evaluation for Change”, wherein I had presented the paper (abstract is given below), jointly written by Ms. Vimala Ramachandran and myself, under the sub-theme “Evaluation for Equity”.

It was a wonderful opportunity to meet fellow researchers and evaluators from different organizations and countries. Since our paper was an evaluation of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan (SSA), primarily from gender and equity lens, I was looking forward to getting more insights into how other organizations have conducted equity-based evaluations for different programs. As a part of our panel, there were 5 presentations, including ours:

  1. Applying an equity lens to development evaluation: why and how? By Urs Nagel, Regional Evaluation Advisor, UNICEF.
  2. Evaluation for equity in general education, by Sujata N. Gamage, LIRNEasia
  3. Meta evaluations with a gender and equity lens: Evaluating evaluations of an economic empowerment program for women in India by Tanisha Jugran and Shraddha Chigateri, ISST
  4. PAHEL: Empowering elected women representatives to monitor and advocate for quality of sexual reproduction health services by Aparajita Gogoi, Madhu Joshi and Manju Katoch, CEDPA.

One of the main learning for me from the conference was that there is a need to measure how various equity-based evaluation programs ultimately impact various stakeholders, especially vulnerable groups, women and children.

We know that there are many determinants of equity – location, gender, social and cultural groups, caste identity and socio-economic status. We also know that these determinants are inter-related and inter-dependent. Therefore, I wanted to understand in what ways different equity-based evaluation programs are integrating all these aspects, what methodologies are being employed and what conclusions are drawn after such evaluations, especially in the field of education. Further, apart from equity-based determinants, there are many crosscutting issues that equally impact equity in education, for example, teacher behavior and attitude, role of SMCs, school infrastructure, distribution of incentives and scholarships etc. In such a situation, what sort of policies should be put in place so that they address all these crosscutting issues simultaneously.

Another aspect on which I was looking for information was examples of different case studies where the results of evaluation programs created an impact on the lives of various stakeholders. However, due to limited time, not many case studies were presented and discussed. It would have been enriching if there were more examples of equity-based evaluations. Finally, one last question that was largely left unanswered was what happens in situations when policy makers’ refuses to acknowledge the results of equity based evaluations.

In conclusion, while the conference provided a platform to share case studies from different countries, I was hoping for more examples of equity-based evaluations.

 

Abstract

Evaluation of gender and equity issues under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan

Vimala Ramachandran and Prerna Goel Chatterjee

In the last 50 years, India has made significant progress in the field of education. Almost 96% children between 6-14 years are currently enrolled in schools (ASER, 2012[1]). However, data on enrolment highlights only one aspect of children’s participation in schooling. Similarly, even though significant progress has been made to bridge gender and social gaps in schools, there are still huge challenges in bridging this gap, especially beyond primary school. Many reasons have been ascribed to this including poverty, gender relations in society, poor school infrastructure, caste/community hierarchies, discrimination, shortage of female teachers etc. In fact, gender and equity issues get more complex when we move beyond male-female and rural-urban categories and start including factors such as location (for e.g. remote, tribal, conflict areas), caste/social/religious identity, economic status, type of school (e.g. government, private), occupation of parents and disabilities. Keeping this in mind, current study tries to understand how gender and equity issues are being addressed under Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan (Universal Elementary Education).  

In 2001, the Government of India launched Sarva Shiksha Abhiyaan (SSA) with the specific purpose of achieving universal elementary education. One of the main goals of SSA was to bridge gender and social gaps at primary education level by 2007 and at elementary education level by 2010. Even though SSA program is primarily financed by the Government of India, three external Development Partners (DP) also contribute funds towards SSA, namely: World Bank’s International Development Association (IDA), United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) and the European Union (EU). Being a partnership program, a six monthly review is carried out by the GOI and DP, which is known as the Joint Review Mission (JRM).

This desk review was conceptualized with the purpose of doing a thorough review monitoring and evaluation processes of SSA JRM reports in order to understand how gender and equity goals have been tracked and addressed by the government and donor partners. In fact, this is perhaps one of the first studies to explore the effectiveness of M&E processes of SSA.

In this study, following questions have also been explored:

  • How is equity and gender understood within SSA framework?
  • Is the focus of JRM on input variables, process indicators and/or output indicators?
  • To what extend does it include teaching-learning process and curriculum related issues?
  • Does it also looks at teacher deployment, teacher attitude and practices, and teacher training? If yes, in what ways?
  • Is the experience of schooling taken into consideration? In particular, issues of caste/community based inclusion and exclusion; child abuse (physical, emotional, sexual); and corporal punishment.
  • What has been various gender related issues that have been flagged in SSA JRM and recommendations made over the years?

 


[1] ASER (2013). Annual Status of Education Report (Rural) 2012. ASER Centre, New Delhi.

Views: 151

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Gender and Evaluation to add comments!

Join Gender and Evaluation

Comment by Prerna Goel Chatterjee on February 18, 2014 at 9:59

Thank you Dr. Gandhi.

Comment by Dr Valentine J Gandhi on February 18, 2014 at 9:56

This is a good article. 

Comment by Rituu B Nanda on September 2, 2013 at 10:49

Hi Prerna, thanks for sharing! Would it be possible for you to share an abstract of your presentation at SLEVA? Warm greetings.

© 2020   Created by Rituu B Nanda.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service