Monthly Corner
Astha Ramaiya [Co-author] Shared the Journal Article - Published in Child Abuse & Neglect, June 2026
A new systematic review published in Child Abuse & Neglect examined the link between mental health and technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse (TF-CSEA). Analysing 10 studies with over 25,000 participants across seven countries, researchers found that depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and prior trauma were consistently associated with victimisation. Crucially, the relationship appears bidirectional with mental health difficulties both preceding and resulting from exploitation; creating potential cycles of repeated harm. Perhaps most striking: traditional parental monitoring through technological surveillance showed limited protective effects. What actually mattered? The quality of parent-child relationships including, open communication, emotional warmth, and trust. The findings suggest prevention efforts should combine universal school-based programmes building emotional resilience with targeted support for high-risk youth, while parent education should prioritise connection over control. With 12.5% of children globally experiencing online solicitation annually, understanding these psychological pathways is essential for effective child protection.
Alok Srivastava, Vasanti Rao & Amita Puri Article on International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, January 2026
Tara Prasad Article on Challanges and Lessons Learns of GESI responsive and inclusive conservatiom practices, Nepal
Ritu Dewan & Swati Raju Article on Economic and Political Weekly
Viera Schioppetto shared Thesis on Gender Approach in Development Projects
Events
Vacancies
- Seeking Senior Analyst - IPE Global
About the job
IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.
Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.
Role Overview
IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.
Evaluating SDGs with an equity focused and gender responsive lens
Looking particularly into the Indian context, here are some of the thoughts, while we undertake the journey towards SDGs:
- Considering the diversities and complexities of the social & economic vulnerabilities & exclusion in India, achieving SDGs by 2030 will be as challenging as it was for MDGs, both for the Indian Government and the National & International Development partners / actors
- "Exclusion" is a key factor for the vulnerability and marginalization of a huge cross sections of population: agree that we need not talk "only about inclusion of women" but "inclusion of increasing number and types of excluded communities": LGBT, indigenous, migrants & refugees (from international context), people with disability, people infected / affected by HIV & Leprosy, Elderly, children, Dalits….and many more (though within these groups also, women generally are more vulnerable & thus doubly marginalized): and without ensuring social economic and political inclusion of all of these groups / sections, achieving SDGs will not be possible
- Evaluation communities continuously need to work on designing more effective methodologies and tools to answer "how evaluations can ensure that the inclusion of all cross-sections are objectively assessed, how the voices of the excluded people are heard during evaluations, and how evaluations can lead to creating a facilitative environment for the same….listening to only a certain sections and capturing / documenting their voice only is no more going to help
- We all agree that Evaluations (and Evaluators) have a very important role in the journey towards SDGs: and at the same time, there are questions on the effectiveness and use of evaluations:
1. to what extent evaluations are taken seriously by relevant stakeholders? How evaluations & integration of its results can be made mandatory for any development program, be it by the Government, by Corporate, or by NGOs? How evaluations can go beyond a formality / routine exercise and taken seriously by all concerned: as a tool for change, as a process to enhance program relevance & effectiveness, as a way to enhance inclusion of the excluded?
2. To what extent evaluations are (not only) gender-responsive but also responsive to all types of exclusion, marginalization, vulnerabilities & inequalities: do we have adequate, appropriate, effective tools and techniques to make evaluations responsive to inequality and exclusion? During evaluations, are we really able to reach to the "most excluded" population & include their voices?
3. To what extent evaluations are participatory, realistic, context-specific, customized and use-focused? To what extent the findings and recommendations from the evaluations are "actually used" to bring the desired changes? The "Fear Factor" with evaluation is still very high, and the hide & seek game goes on during evaluations: how to make evaluations enabling and facilitative so that it can create ownership among all stakeholders & contribute to positive changes, leading to SDG?
4. How evaluations can influence the larger players in the development sector: particularly the government, whose financial investment will be the maximum, for programs aimed at SDG? Can evaluations influence & guide the policy making at the government level to make government development programs gender-responsive, fully inclusive and based on the principles of equity and equality? And beyond that, how evaluations can influence the decision making process at the international community level?
For finding realistic solutions to the above challenges, we, the evaluators and evaluation communities need to come closer and together, not merely to share thoughts and theoretical perspectives, but to share our individual and institutional resources, in terms of effective tools, techniques, designs and methodologies, to make evaluations responsive and inclusive. By coming together, not only we can enrich each other, build our own capacities further and find out ways & measures for better evaluations, but also advocate for including the voices of the excluded at different forums, and engage with and influence the larger players in the development sector. Be it a small evaluation organization or a large, we have to take the ownership and responsibility to customize our evaluations in such a manner that it always contributes to SDG.
Add a Comment
-
Comment by Shyam Singh on March 28, 2016 at 21:51
-
Use of evaluation results should be given important space in the whole debate of evaluating impact of SDGs. We could never know as to what happened with various evaluations that took place to evaluate MDGs and what actions were taken by the state and central governments/Planning Commission as well as development community to address the concerns coming out of those evaluation exercises. Our focus must not be limited to methodologies, which is though important, we should also be able to run follow-ups on the use of the findings of such evaluations.
© 2026 Created by Rituu B Nanda.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Gender and Evaluation to add comments!
Join Gender and Evaluation