Monthly Corner

IDH and WSAF Publication of ToolKit

Toolkit for business: Investing in women’s economic empowerment to strengthen supply chain resilience

Tashi Dendup Blog

From Rhetoric to Action: A Call for Genuine Engagement of Young and Emerging Evaluators (YEE)

David Wand - Podcast Reviewing Somalia SRH GBV project Performance Measurement Framework

UNFPA Somalia reproductive health project: Flaws in the Performance Measurement Framework

Public Health Journal - December, 2024

FAIRSTEPS study - Framework Addressing Inequities in pRimary care using STakEholder PerspectiveS: Integrative evidence review and Delphi consensus

Please get in touch with Steven Ariss (s.ariss@sheffield.ac.uk) if you’re keen to learn more or would like more FAIRSTEPS related resources.

ORACLE NEWS DAILY - Article by George S. Tengbeh

Liberia: Why A full-time Legal Academic Heading the WECC Office as the Executive Director is a Sound Judgment: Who is Cllr. Jallah Barbu and What Processes led to his Appointment?

IEG & World Bank Publication - October, 2024

An Evaluation of World Bank and International Finance Corporation Engagement for Gender Equality over the Past 10 Years

Getaneh Gobezie - Two Blogs

EVALSDGs Insight Dialogue - October 23rd 2024

Quick tips to assess the risks of AI applications in Monitoring and Evaluation

recording here, and the Evaluation Insight here.

Value for Women Publication 2024

Events

FGTE: Facilitating Gender Transformative Evaluations - For Senior Professionals

October 3, 2024 at 5pm to January 3, 2025 at 7pm – Google Class Room
0 Comments 1 Like

Online Course on Gender and Development (GDT) - 2024 Edition

December 4, 2024 at 9am to December 31, 2024 at 5pm – https://justicegroup.org/courses/gender-and-development/
0 Comments 4 Likes

Online Course on Project Development and Management from a Gender Perspective - 2024 Edition

December 11, 2024 at 9am to January 10, 2025 at 7pm – Online [web-based]
0 Comments 1 Like

IDEAS Conference March 4 to 6 2025

March 4, 2025 at 6pm to March 6, 2025 at 7pm – Europe
0 Comments 0 Likes

Members

View All

Webinar on lessons from “most significant change” method

Event Details

Time: January 8, 2020 from 9am to 10am
Location: Online January 8, 2020 at 9 a.m. EST
Event Type: webinar
Organized By: Data for Impact (D4I) and USAID
Latest Activity: Jan 8, 2020

Export to Outlook or iCal (.ics)

3 members like this

Event Description

Join Data for Impact on January 8, 2020 at 9 a.m. EST for a one-hour webinar sharing lessons learned in using most significant change for evaluation.

Today, evaluations require methods that are flexible; allow for the complexity of current public health programming in low-resource settings; and address field challenges such as strict budget and time constraints, limited baseline data, and lack of access to comparison groups. Under these circumstances, the most significant change (MSC) method is a useful tool for evaluators.

MSC is a method for surveying diverse program stakeholders and participants with open-ended queries to gather their observations of important changes resulting from a program. MSC is useful when evaluating a program that must adapt to different or evolving contexts. It is appropriate when the evaluation seeks to learn and to show accountability. The MSC method helps evaluators to assess the performance of a program and show whether the program objectives were met.

In this webinar, you will learn how this method was adapted for public health evaluations in multiple contexts in Africa and Asia, including a case study on recent work in Uganda and Ghana for an evaluation of the Local Capacity Initiative, and review lessons learned from its implementation.

Register to attend the webinar.

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

RSVP for Webinar on lessons from “most significant change” method to add comments!

Join Gender and Evaluation

Comment by Jenny Iao on January 7, 2020 at 21:43: To what extent verfication of results with non-implementing stakeholders is needed for having minimal robustness of evidence? How many sources or stakeholders are needed for one reporting change?