Monthly Corner

F Njahîra Wangarî - Book Chapter

Abstract
"This chapter blends African oral and written narratives, lived experiences with a genetic chronic disability and a Roman Catholic upbringing. These will be interrogated to illustrate the role of alternative explanations in influencing advocacy and activism for the lives, wellbeing, dignity and inclusion of persons with disabilities. Particularly, this chapter is an exploration of self-identity and how persons with disabilities are conditioned to view ourselves in specific ways while highlighting alternative perceptions available is presented by the author. It engages the works of several African and African-descendent authors who feature persons with disabilities as characters in their books and relies on narrative prosthesis as the basis for this engagement."

Alok Srivastava -  Article in Journal of Generic Medicines

Claudy Vouhé shared Publication

It relates strongly to the evaluation of public policies and gender equality by parliaments, as it is about Gender responsive budgeting.

Svetlana Negroustoueva shared Publication

Hooshmand Alizadeh Recently published book

now available from Springer.

Events

Members

project follow-up method (Expert evaluation needed)

Hello everyone,

I just finished writing my MSc thesis on project follow+up method based on the RBM framework. The method is to be used for both ongoing and completed projects. The idea is to evaluate changes in inputs and outputs at different points of a project life cycle.

I am however required to have the method evaluated by experts for learneability, understaandibility and rigour. 

Will anyone of you be able to help me with this? I have summarised the introduction and evaluation criteria in two pages.

Do let me know if you can help me with this.

Thanks

Gideon

gijo7362@student.su.se

Views: 153

Attachments:

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Rituu B Nanda on May 22, 2014 at 18:32

Here is a response 

Dear Rituu,

Great to hear from you and thanks for facilitating the peer-review of this tool.
However, I opened the two-page PDF document mentioned in your post and I found it really difficult to provide some valuable feedback to the MSc student in question, based on some very generic description of the RBM literature which he based his work on. It is important that he shares his artifact (that is, the actual tool) if he wants to receive a constructive feedback and that, before doing it, he also targets some scholars and field implementers (e.g., those whose names he may have come across in the course of his research/prior professional experience). 
Mine is just a humble contribution to this discussion and my intention is to make sure that the student who worked on this follow-up tool will benefit from a sound peer-review (e.g., receiving some appropriate and competent feedback).
Best of luck to Gideon and all the other talented Africans who are currently completing their university degrees both within and outside of Africa!
Best,
Michele
 
Michele Tarsilla, Ph.D. in Evaluation 
Evaluation Capacity Development Group (ECDG), Vice-President 
Permalink Reply by Ranjani K.Murthy on May 29, 2014 at 18:32

Dear Gideon 

I think this method is great, as unless input and processes are in place the outputs, outcomes and impact cannot be achieved. 

I am interested in evaluating this method from the lens of learnability, understanding and rigour; as well as gender and equity

Best   

Ranjani

 

RSS

© 2025   Created by Rituu B Nanda.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service