Key learnings from discussions on evaluating SDGs with a equity & gender lens

[Rituu B Nanda]

This is a great opportunity to work closely with the Evaluation Team Leader and contribute to generating credible, gender-responsive evidence that informs decision-making and strengthens programme impact.

📍 Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh (home-based with travel to project locations)
📅 Apply by: 24 February 2026, 5:00 PM
🔗 Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gar4ciRr

If you are passionate about feminist evaluation, gender equality, and rigorous evidence that drives change (or know someone who is) please apply or share within your networks.

[Elisabetta Micaro]

Thanks a lot to Rituu and others to put together this summary. I wasn't there so it is wonderful to have access to key points of the discussions. I see some of those are unlearned lessons (yet very important!). I like the emphasis on evaluation as a political act and the idea of evaluation as a transformative process. We all need to work further on this to make sure evaluation becomes a relevant and effective tool to support change of power relations. 

Best

 

Elisabetta

[susmita mukherjee]

Thanks Rituu for sharing the summary. Hope you had a wonderful meeting there.

regards

Sushmita

[Svetlana Negroustoueva]

Thanks Rituu for a good summary. I wanted to complement with a few citations from such presenters as people as Maria Bustello (former president of EES), Thomas Shwandt (AEA), Andrea Cooke (UNFPA) and Colin Kirk (UNICEF). I also wanted to include some summary learnings: to me it was a really rare opportunity when evaluation and gender really came together, both in the expertise in the audience and in convictions expressed from the stage or in the working groups.  

 

“Transformative power of feminist approaches to evaluation, economics. ..Now the focus should be on those behind and at the bottom, rather than aggregates.” (AC)

 

 “ Evaluators need to be activists, need to turn the wheel from evidence to policy and back. Need to work in solidarity, in the community working with program implementers, in a political side. (CK)

 

“ Evaluation can challenge what SDGs don’t intend to challenge. Lets empower ourselves as to say what is good and bad” (MB)

 

To the pleasure and a strong encouragement for this community, one of the key principles of feminist evaluation was pronounced from the stage “Evaluation is political activity: thus it has the power to identify: what questions, what consequences are intended and not; and who is in and out (whether from the evaluation participants or commissioners.”

 

-          Cases have more power than averages especially in the context of gender equality/social equity: evaluators have necessary to dig for cases. Cases have more power. However, the power of statistics to show where averages are, and identify quintiles for focus and samples for case studies, should not be underestimated.

 

-          Complexity of the issues calls for pluralism of approaches, evaluators need capacities and desires to embrace methodological sophistication. There is a recognized value of using adaptive approaches, which are more important and necessary than ever before: adaptive to national contexts, as well as global and regional realities.

 

-          Data become evidence when they are used in an argument. Evaluators can make claims using the data, with authority, based on merit.

 

-          Indicators are political instruments: they affect goal setting and, thus, program implementation. Notably, indicator frameworks rest on phenomena understanding of what they intend to measure within the contexts in which programs are implemented.

 

And last by not the least, plea from politicians: “For politicians and MPs data are less important: rather focus should be on systems for analysis and data presentation. MPs are the link between CSO and politicians” (especially important in the context of SDG discussions). The way how evidence enters political discourse needs further exploration and strategies. Evidence-informed policy making is still an aspiration, but should be an action point for evaluators and MPs.

[Awuor Ponge]

Thank you so much Rituu for sharing this. What we missed in New York, we surely have got in this.  Didn't even follow it online as I was in an internet NILL zone. You represented us well. We are Happy!

[Paloma Lafuente Gómez]

Thank you very much for the details and conclusions, Rituu.

It is a useful roadmap!

[Mary Nderitu]

Thanks Rituu, the discussants also talked about statistics and true data in informing policy engagement, as a basis in programming and as a reference point since there are many varied datas from different agencies to a particular geographic location.

[Silvia Salinas Mulder]

Thanks Rituu and also thanks Sarah, we worked in the same direction, I just wanted to post a Spanish translation....Great we are building language bridges, that help to build other bridges so that NONE IS LEFT BEHIND!!!

Gracias Rituu y también gracias Sarah, trabajamos en la misma dirección, yo justamente iba a colbar una traducción al español....Excelente que estemos construyendo puentes de idioma, que ayudan a construir otros puentes, para que NADIE SE QUEDE ATRÁS!!!

[Sarah Zapata Pimentel]

Aqui les va en español.

[Sarah Zapata Pimentel]

Estos son los puntos clave de lo que compartieron en la reunión de alto nivel realizada del 15 al 17 de Marzo, 2016; en Nueva York el marco del foro para evaluar los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenibles con un enfoque de equidad y género.
Resumen preparado gracias a: Andrea Cook, María Bustelo , Michael Bamberger , Florencia Etta , Rosario Cárdenas y Thomas Schwandt

- Proceso de cambio no es lineal , es muy complejo .
Desafío consistirá en medir la vulnerabilidad
Con la evaluación tenemos que ser críticos e ir más allá de la integración, no solo de la mujer, sino también, la voz de los Homosexuales , indígenas , migrantes , refugiados ( Una mujer indígena de edad está entre las más discriminadas)
¿Cómo se va a evaluar la sostenibilidad?
La complejidad en Evaluación- complejidad no es nuevo... es una forma de vida
No omitir consecuencias no deseados
Delimitar fronteras en la evaluación
Ampliar los involucrados en Evalgender, muchas personas están tratando de motivar sobre evaluación a- Los parlamentarios, los evaluadores, las OSC, la ONU, el mundo académico, Estadísticos, entre otros.
Todos los stakeholders, o interesados debemos tomar parte en la evaluación de los ODS.
No dejar a nadie detrás es muy importante, pero un gran desafío
Acciones participativas son fundamentales para que el proceso de evaluación sea un proceso de transformación
Capacidades que hay que agregar y cuales actores necesitan mas formación y donde provienen los recursos.
Las herramientas cualitativas son importantes, ademas son culturalmente sensibles
La creación de canales de comunicación entre las diferentes partes interesadas en la evaluación
La colaboración es punto clave para la amplificación de los evaluadores de impacto tendrá en la evaluación de los ODS.
La evaluación es crítica social sobre las expectativas desafiantes, para reconocer que la evaluación necesita el pensamiento crítico
La evaluación es la empresa social - institucionalización de la evaluación en las políticas y en los programas de gobierno
Democratizar evaluación: qué perspectivas cuentan, que está dentro, que está fuera
Cada evaluación es un acto político. Los indicadores son política y la elección de los indicadores es política
2030 es un contrato social entre los titulares de derechos y los responsables políticos; Esto tiene experiencia en la promoción del contrato.

[Beryl Leach]

Dear Rituu:

Huge thanks for such a helpful and thorough summary.  I'm very glad that you could be there and for your tireless commitment to information sharing.  I read this list as a call to action.