Monthly Corner

F Njahîra Wangarî - Book Chapter

Abstract
"This chapter blends African oral and written narratives, lived experiences with a genetic chronic disability and a Roman Catholic upbringing. These will be interrogated to illustrate the role of alternative explanations in influencing advocacy and activism for the lives, wellbeing, dignity and inclusion of persons with disabilities. Particularly, this chapter is an exploration of self-identity and how persons with disabilities are conditioned to view ourselves in specific ways while highlighting alternative perceptions available is presented by the author. It engages the works of several African and African-descendent authors who feature persons with disabilities as characters in their books and relies on narrative prosthesis as the basis for this engagement."

Alok Srivastava -  Article in Journal of Generic Medicines

Claudy Vouhé shared Publication

It relates strongly to the evaluation of public policies and gender equality by parliaments, as it is about Gender responsive budgeting.

Svetlana Negroustoueva shared Publication

Hooshmand Alizadeh Recently published book

now available from Springer.

Events

Members

A few takeaways on day 3 of Eval week & photo of the day

Photo of the day- I was able to catch on camera- Marco Segone, A K Shiva Kumar and Yamini Atmavilas in front of the Gender and Evaluation community poster:-)

Key learnings

Dr Rajib Nandi’s presentation on India Feminist Evaluation groups learning over the past two year evoked many questions like 

What is the difference between feminist and gender-responsive and equity focused evaluation?The word evaluator sounds like external policing. What about community?

Vimala Ramachandran, National University of Educational Planning and Administration

She listed equity issues she came across during meta evaluation of India's flagship programme for achievement of Universalization of Elementary Education. This will give you an idea of how to use gender and equity lens in evaluation.Gender is equated with girls and boys have been excluded from the conversation. The Joint review mission evaluations have been weak in analysis when it comes to various socio-economic factors such as occupation, family income, caste religion and education level of parents. Many girls schools do not offer science subjects.

Howard White from 3 ie mentioned types of bias in evaluation- selection bias, study bias (Having genuine mixed methods is a challenge), agency bias, respondent bias, Evaluator bias, Friends bias.

Marco Segone – Challenges to Gender and equity focused evaluations. Here are two slides from him. He also facilitated a discussion amongst participants. Will type them out and share with you.

 


Views: 349

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Gender and Evaluation to add comments!

Join Gender and Evaluation

Comment by susmita mukherjee on January 23, 2015 at 10:55

Thanks a lot Rituu. It was actually great to hear all the deliberations from all experts during the entire week. 

Comment by Jindra Cekan, PhD on January 22, 2015 at 13:20

I agree, many thanks for updating us and of course the EFE brings up uncomfortable issues. Yay!

Comment by Rukmini Panda on January 22, 2015 at 11:41

Thanks Rituu for all your good efforts to make us aware about the events, discourses etc.

Comment by Maggie Schmeitz on January 22, 2015 at 0:43

Sounds very interesting! I am looking forward to the presentations in full. Thanks so much for making us all over the world being able to share in this information.

© 2025   Created by Rituu B Nanda.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service