IDH Publication, 2026
Gender-Based Violence (GBV) is not just a social issue, it’s a systemic challenge that undermines agricultural value chains.
In rural and isolated areas, GBV threatens women’s safety, limits their economic participation, and weakens food security. When women cannot work safely, entire communities lose resilience, and businesses lose productivity. Climate resilience strategies that overlook gendered risks leave communities exposed and women vulnerable.
Ending GBV is essential for building equitable, sustainable, and climate-resilient agri-food systems; and it’s not only a human rights imperative, but also central to climate adaptation and economic stability.
The good news? Solutions work. Programs like the Women’s Safety Accelerator Fund (WSAF) demonstrate that addressing GBV can enhance productivity and strengthen workforce morale and brand reputation. Safe, inclusive workplaces aren’t just good ethics, they’re smart business.
Gurmeet Kaur Articles
Luc Barriere-Constantin Article
This article draws on the experience gained by The Constellation over the past 20 years. It is also a proposal for a new M&E and Learning framework to be adopted and adapted in future projects of all community-focused organisations.
Devaka K.C. Article
Sudeshna Sengupta Chapter in the book "Dialogues on Development edited by Prof Arash Faizli and Prof Amitabh Kundu."
Vacancy | GxD hub, LEAD/IFMR | Research Manager
Hiring a Research Manager to join us at the Gender x Digital (GxD) Hub at LEAD at Krea University, Delhi.
As a Research Manager, you will lead and shape rigorous evidence generation at the intersection of gender, AI, and digital systems, informing more inclusive digital policies and platforms in India. This role is ideal for someone who enjoys geeking out over measurement challenges, causal questions, and the nuances of designing evaluations that answer what works, for whom, and why. We welcome applications from researchers with strong mixed-methods expertise, experience designing theory or experiment based evaluations, and a deep commitment to gender equality and digital inclusion.
Must-haves:
• 4+ years of experience in evaluation and applied research
• Ability to manage data quality, lead statistical analysis, and translate findings into clear, compelling reports and briefs
• Strong interest in gender equality, livelihoods, and digital inclusion
• Comfort with ambiguity and a fast-paced environment, as the ecosystem evolves and pivots to new areas of inquiry
📍 Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gcBpjtHy
📆 Applications will be reviewed on a rolling basis until the position is filled.
So sooner you apply the better!
Dear colleagues, I am seeking to get insight into how to measure/evaluate behavioural change in response to a capacity building intervention in the agriculture sector. I would be grateful if someone could please share with me your thoughts on the topic. I look forward to hearing from you.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Kaleab Kebede Haile on December 7, 2020 at 22:16 Hi Archana, thanks for your explanation. How can I infere behavioural change by making use of observational data on actual practices? Do I need to set standards?
Please, all the stuff you have read, set them aside for now (The stuff might help anyway). But get this: If you know the difference between attitude and behaviour, logically you can measure either attitudinal change or behavioural change without stress.
Attitude is more or less an intension while behavour is an action. Attitude (intension) is a good predictive factor of behaviour (action) but may not necessarily lead to behaviour (action). Now apply this to your query, you want to measure/evaluate the change of actions that have taken place in response to a capacity building intervention in the agriculture sector. Please, questions that must be used for the scale of measurement should be action specific or oriented. Let me give you an insight: 1. You had used cutlass and hoes on the farm before, have you started using tractors? Here, you want to measure the change of action (positive or negative) that have taken place after you have built their capacity in the use of modern farm equipment. 2. If it is attitude (intention) you want to measure, you will ask: Will you use tractors in future? Or will you now use tractors? Here, you want to measure the intention (positive or negative)
Now, there are different types of capacity. You need to know the type of capacity that was built. Is it personal capacity or system capacity or workload capacity or structural capacity or role capacity or performance capacity or support capacity etc. If you know the type(s) of capacity that was/were built, you will tailor your behavioural (action) questions in line with the type(s). The example I gave above has to do with Performance Capacity since the question dealt with EQUIPMENT.
In case of evaluation, your INDICATORS of achievement must reflect what I wrote above. I said this because you are not measuring outcomes, you are measuring impacts. Why? Behavioural (Action) What change of action has taken place? And since the issue here is specific and not general, you don't need any CONTROL STUDY.
Regards, respect and much love from Nigeria.
MOSH
Permalink Reply by Kaleab Kebede Haile on December 7, 2020 at 22:10 Hi Folorunsho, if I get your response correctly, are you suggesting the Knowledge, Attitude (intention) and Practice (action) framework? Or is there more to it?
Dear Kaleab:
You did not get it because I never mentioned knowledge and practice to you. Read my suggestion very well and show me those two words (knowledge and practice) you used. However, if it is knowledge you want to measure, it is as simple as ABC, all your questions for the measuring scale will be close-ended and the answers will be monosyllabic (Yes or No). Why? Measuring knowledge is about whether you know the subject matter or not. But your work is on behavioural change and not on knowledge, not on practice. It is all about action(s) carried out.
Read my suggestion with rapt attention to understand it. Thanks
Dear Rituu and Kaeab,
If the attached document help for requested insights, please refer it.CLA-Geteneh%20Moges.pdf
Permalink Reply by Kaleab Kebede Haile on December 7, 2020 at 22:11 Thanks Geteneh, I will surely take a look at it.
Thanks Anirban, Geteneh, Michael, Moshood, Pramod, and Shankar for your prompt response. I appreciate it very much.
Hi Kaleab
Have you heard of "Most Significant Change"? It is a methodology developed by two evaluators who devised initially for agricultural extension projects - see The 'Most Significant Change' Technique - A Guide to Its Use | Bett... and MSC_finalextra_single (mande.co.uk)
It has been used extensively here in Australia by Dr Jessica Dart and overseas by her colleague Dr Rick Davies. Best of luck
Larraine Larri
Permalink Reply by Kaleab Kebede Haile on December 8, 2020 at 20:18 Hi Larraine! I hadn't heard of it, but now that has changed. Thank you for introducing me to an additional approach (tool) for measuring behavioural change.
© 2026 Created by Rituu B Nanda.
Powered by