IDH Publication, 2026
Gender-Based Violence (GBV) is not just a social issue, it’s a systemic challenge that undermines agricultural value chains.
In rural and isolated areas, GBV threatens women’s safety, limits their economic participation, and weakens food security. When women cannot work safely, entire communities lose resilience, and businesses lose productivity. Climate resilience strategies that overlook gendered risks leave communities exposed and women vulnerable.
Ending GBV is essential for building equitable, sustainable, and climate-resilient agri-food systems; and it’s not only a human rights imperative, but also central to climate adaptation and economic stability.
The good news? Solutions work. Programs like the Women’s Safety Accelerator Fund (WSAF) demonstrate that addressing GBV can enhance productivity and strengthen workforce morale and brand reputation. Safe, inclusive workplaces aren’t just good ethics, they’re smart business.
Gurmeet Kaur Articles
Luc Barriere-Constantin Article
This article draws on the experience gained by The Constellation over the past 20 years. It is also a proposal for a new M&E and Learning framework to be adopted and adapted in future projects of all community-focused organisations.
Devaka K.C. Article
Sudeshna Sengupta Chapter in the book "Dialogues on Development edited by Prof Arash Faizli and Prof Amitabh Kundu."
UN Women is recruiting a National Evaluation Consultant (Bangladesh) to support the interim evaluation of the Joint Regional EmPower Programme (Phase II).
This is a great opportunity to work closely with the Evaluation Team Leader and contribute to generating credible, gender-responsive evidence that informs decision-making and strengthens programme impact.
📍 Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh (home-based with travel to project locations)
📅 Apply by: 24 February 2026, 5:00 PM
🔗 Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gar4ciRr
If you are passionate about feminist evaluation, gender equality, and rigorous evidence that drives change (or know someone who is) please apply or share within your networks.
IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.
Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.
Role Overview
IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.

Shabnam Sambyal Online
Harshita Chanchal Online

Vidhi Singh Online
Dear friends,
In partnership with UNDP India, the Department of Justice, Government of India is implementing the project ‘Access to Justice to Marginalized Communities’. The project focuses on strengthening access to justice for the poor by developing strategies that address barriers to accessing justice in legal, social, economic and political domains.
One of the core components of the project is the development of legal literacy content in the form of training material/manuals and mainstreaming legal literacy through the National Literacy Mission Authority programmes, Common Service Centres (CSC), National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), State Legal Services Authorities (SALSA) and civil society organisations.
A set of actors such as para legal workers, empaneled lawyers with legal services authorities, law students and community members in select districts of Orissa, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Jharkhand in India have been trained. These groups are expected to reach out to the marginalized communities to make them aware of their legal rights and entitlements, provide free legal aid and empower them to seek speedy, affordable and quality justice. ICT tools such as information kiosks have been used at 50 locations in district legal services authorities towards this objective.
The project now intends to assess the impact of these training programmes on the increased awareness of these marginalized communities- whether there is now a change in their lives as a result of legal awareness training, are they able to better access their entitlements?
In this context, we seek inputs from members on:
What examples can you share of simple tools to get feedback/assessment from communities/citizens on the following aspects?
This query has been posted on the Decentralization Community, Solution Exchange of the United Nations in India. Your responses will be gratefully acknowledged and shared back with the project team and the Decentralization Community.
Thank you and regards, Tina
Tags:
Hi Tina,
Most Significant Change would appear to be well suited to this type of assessment http://betterevaluation.org/resources/guides/most_significant_change
I also wish to take this opportunity to suggest you drop the word "impact" from your assessment objective or define the term clearly. Impact has become a loaded term which has become to all extent and purposes meaningless, although it is popular and seems to generate support from donors (read funding). The word also conveys a one-off conception of "success", e.g. we've implemented the program, people have responded positively, we can now go home and claim success.
The reach challenge is sustainability, as in sustainable processes. "Results", including "impact", tend to be one-offs. Assessing those tells you little about the reality of the processes, including, and I would argue more importantly, those not related to "intended results". So I encourage you to focus your assessment on processes, those that matter most to the individuals who are affected by them.
Cheers,
Ians
That is helpful and I agree. May I ask how what would you consider changing "impact" to?
Vedhna
Hi Vedhna,
I would change it to "value".
Cheers,
Ian
Permalink Reply by Tina Mathur on March 10, 2016 at 10:35 Hi Ian, thanks for your suggestion on focusing the assessment on processes and for sharing the evaluation guidelines.
Hi Tina,
I would suggest two processes if you want to measure perception and behaviour change.
One is using Constellation's self assessment framework. Here the trainees can define their dream for the issue on which they were trained and where are they in terms of the response to the dream after having attended the training. As it is self assessment the participants will be more honest. This process also creates a space where participants can share openly, excellent for capturing from gender and equity lens. Here is the link http://communitylifecompetence.org/en/pages/8-community-life-compet...
Second process I will suggest is in which all primary stakeholders can engage in is participatory action research.
Both the above processes have sytematic reflection and action learning cycle. I am happy to respond to further queries if any.
Thanks
Rituu
Constellation/ISST
Permalink Reply by Fanaye Gebrehiwot Feleke on March 7, 2016 at 16:51 Hi Tina,
How about using the community score cards, it is a well used tool in India.
Selam,
Fanaye
Permalink Reply by Tina Mathur on March 10, 2016 at 11:02 Thank you Fanaye, yes we have some good examples of community score cards and will use that, we are looking at more innovative ways also.
regards,
Tina
Dear Tina
Thanks for your posting. Based on my experience of evaluation of a project on violence against women, I have some suggestions which you may take into consideration.
The questions may be so many as per your need. To each question, the respondents would be asked to give mark on scale of 1 to 10. How do they evaluate themselves. Based on the score, the analysis may be done.
Thanks & Regards
Rukmini
Permalink Reply by Tina Mathur on March 10, 2016 at 10:39 Dear Rukmini,
Thanks for your suggestions. Can you also suggest some resources/ reports that we can refer to where the KII and Empowerment Matrix have been used?
Regards,
Tina
Dear Tina
It was a Oxfam project's in-house evaluation,which was done by Praxis and I was a part of it. But I do not know whether it is available in public domain being their in-house evaluation. But I may help you in designing these tools.
Regards,
Rukmini
dear Tina
Most Significant Change is a useful story based tool to get information on changes and the perspectives about what was important from eh respondents perspective (which can be different from the program staff etc) - I you wish further information email me at theonabben@gmail.com or contact me via this group.
Skills needed - basically how to ask questions and listen and record. A qualitative approach vs quantitative mindset.This will work in both cases.
For community use above - also Ten Seed technique perhaps- depends. Again contact time if you wish to explore further. Kind regards Theo
© 2026 Created by Rituu B Nanda.
Powered by