Monthly Corner

Claudy Vouhé shared GRB in local authorities (French)

Gender-Responsive Budgeting (GRB) shows that the development of a budget and budgetary choices are powerful levers in terms of gender equality. We share our lessons learned in the field: a 5-step method, concrete examples (culture, sport, subsidies, public procurement, etc.) and keys to success. An operational work to objectify the impact of public policies and budgets and make RHL accessible.

Anuradha Kapoor Shared Swayam Recent Published Study

This exploratory study foregrounds the largely invisible issue of natal family violence (NFV) in India, exploring its forms, prevalence, and deep, long-term impacts on women's lives. It challenges the myth of the natal home as a safe space and centres survivor voices and lived experiences. The findings expose systemic silences and institutional barriers to justice. It offers vital insights for policy reform, feminist praxis, and deeper societal reflection.

Research Workshop on School Violence Prevention and Response - BLOG POST

Blog post summarizing key findings from each presentation and highlighting the outstanding research of all participants

Tara Prasad Gnyawali - Narrative

My flashback to working with wildlife-affected communities living in a biological transboundary corridor in Bardiya, Nepal, where I spent my golden 15 years. This story reflects changes that demonstrate how a community's tolerance extends to coexistence, and that is only due to the well-integrated planning of Ecotourism opportunities for the community.

Mehreen Farooq - BLOG

Vacancies

  • We’re Hiring: National Evaluation Consultant – Bangladesh

UN Women is recruiting a National Evaluation Consultant (Bangladesh) to support the interim evaluation of the Joint Regional EmPower Programme (Phase II).

This is a great opportunity to work closely with the Evaluation Team Leader and contribute to generating credible, gender-responsive evidence that informs decision-making and strengthens programme impact.

📍 Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh (home-based with travel to project locations)
📅 Apply by: 24 February 2026, 5:00 PM
🔗 Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gar4ciRr

If you are passionate about feminist evaluation, gender equality, and rigorous evidence that drives change (or know someone who is) please apply or share within your networks.

  • Seeking Senior Analyst - IPE Global

About the job

IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.

Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.

Role Overview

IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.

More Details Please go through

Systems Thinking: prioritizing gender, marginalized voices and ecologies

Information

Systems Thinking: prioritizing gender, marginalized voices and ecologies

Prioritizing gender, marginalized voices and ecologies.

Members: 118
Latest Activity: Aug 7, 2024

Prioritizing gender, marginalized voices and ecologies

Gender and Evaluation online community of Practice (CoP)

Systems Thinking Sub-Group

Prioritizing gender, marginalized voices and ecologies

 

Welcome to a new sub-group within the Gender and Evaluation Community focused on the emerging practice of using systems thinking to support evaluation practice in development contexts. The goals for this CoP are:

  • Support discussions, ideas, hopes and concerns about how systems thinking can contribute to the field of evaluation.
  • Build an understanding on how to conduct a ‘systemic boundary critique’ as an ongoing reflective process in all phases of an evaluation.
  • Recognize and share demonstrations of use of prioritizing gender equality, marginalized voices and the environment in evaluation practices.
  • Are there other goals this CoP would be interested in adding?

A Brief Introduction to Systems Thinking:

The idea of systems thinking is that linear cause and effect is insufficient to describe complex and changing situations. Systems thinking is characterized by an appreciation of the interrelatedness of parts within a wider system and the emergence of properties that cannot be fully comprehended by analysis of the system’s essential parts.  For example, women, men, adolescent girls and boys all have important roles and contribute to the fabric of any community’s well-being. To strengthen a community, you might want to understand each gender’s social and economic contribution and needs, the cultural norms for those roles and contributions, and the hopes and concerns of each gender and age group. All of these individual elements are important to support a community development effort but additionally how the individual members interact with each other.

Drs. Anne Stephens and Ellen Lewis are currently working on a new UN Women Independent Office of Evaluation to create a new guidance using systems thinking to prioritize gender, marginalized voices and the environment. You might wonder why we have prioritized and linked gender, marginalization and the environment in this guidance. Each of these lenses urges us to consider how the current and historical exclusions of women, nature and voices from the margins (e.g. human or non-human) are interrelated and can be prioritized to drive social change.  The new systems thinking guidance being developed will draw on the vast wealth of current evaluation practices and methodologies as well (e.g. feminist/gender-responsive evaluation practice, participatory evaluation, developmental evaluation) as a way to provide support to current practice.

Please note that Anne and Ellen are only moderators of this CoP, for all of us together, are equally facilitators and learners of knowledge. We welcome you to this group whether you are new or familiar with systems thinking.

How to join the sub-group?

If you are not a member of gender and evaluation community, please sign up on https://gendereval.ning.com/

Then sign in and click on the link https://gendereval.ning.com/group/developing-a-gendered-systemic-evaluation-guidance. Here on top right hand side click on +Join

Please visit our Anne's and Ellen's weekly blog about the development of a gendered systemic evaluation guidance. Comments are welcome there as well. Please join us in this journey.

https://ethosofengagementcom.wordpress.com/

Discussion Forum

Looking for case studies that have adopted systems thinking and gender-transformative lens together in evaluation

Started by Sheena Kapoor. Last reply by Rituu B Nanda Oct 7, 2022. 3 Replies

Hi everyone, I have been looking around for case studies that have adopted systems thinking and gender-transformative lens together in evaluation. I work with ISST which runs a Gender Transformative…Continue

Theory of Change

Started by Anne Stephens . Last reply by Margerit Roger May 2, 2018. 3 Replies

Hi everyone. We'd welcome your view point and experience of working with a 'Theory of Change'.They have been broadly criticized for being too cause-effect for systemic evaluation. But is it possible…Continue

Out for review!

Started by Anne Stephens . Last reply by John Colvin Apr 22, 2018. 3 Replies

Just to keep our members updated, a draft of Chapters 1 - 5 went out to our Advisory Group of awesome people with expertise in different aspects of systems and/or evaluation practice. We look forward…Continue

What's needed more - Tools, Methodologies or Training?

Started by Anne Stephens . Last reply by Anne Stephens Apr 22, 2018. 2 Replies

This is a question that seems to come up a lot for me. What is it that practitioners really need to be systemic evaluators? Better tools? A way to do a holistic evaluation analysis of impact? Or…Continue

Tags: training, methodology, tools, evaluation, thinking

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Systems Thinking: prioritizing gender, marginalized voices and ecologies to add comments!

Comment by Minal Mehta on April 23, 2018 at 18:25
In addition serious synergistic coordinated mind set so that gaps in the data collector's thinking and interpretation is not overlooked. Person who collects data has also read between lines meaning what is not said and that's where maximum data lies which for Gender evaluation is most important.
Comment by Yulia Immajati on July 24, 2017 at 7:23

Hi everyone. I have been looking around for theoretical and, especially, practical frameworks and tools for gender and environment, especially related to sustainable development, green economy, green growth. Would appreciate kind assistance on the matter. Kind regards.

Comment by Mary Nderitu on June 13, 2016 at 14:20

What's needed more-Tools, methodologies or Training?

 In a systemic evaluation, evaluations should consider all these as not independent but interdependent of each other. Thinking systematically and holistically since they all interrelate. Evaluators need better tools which are determined by methodologies one uses among other considerations, the tools will not only be administered by the evaluator alone but by enumerators, research assistants etc where training on use of these tools is needed so that there is harmonized data collection and understanding of what is needed to be collected. 

 

Members (118)

 
 
 

© 2026   Created by Rituu B Nanda.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service