Monthly Corner
Claudy Vouhé shared GRB in local authorities (French)
Gender-Responsive Budgeting (GRB) shows that the development of a budget and budgetary choices are powerful levers in terms of gender equality. We share our lessons learned in the field: a 5-step method, concrete examples (culture, sport, subsidies, public procurement, etc.) and keys to success. An operational work to objectify the impact of public policies and budgets and make RHL accessible.
Anuradha Kapoor Shared Swayam Recent Published Study
This exploratory study foregrounds the largely invisible issue of natal family violence (NFV) in India, exploring its forms, prevalence, and deep, long-term impacts on women's lives. It challenges the myth of the natal home as a safe space and centres survivor voices and lived experiences. The findings expose systemic silences and institutional barriers to justice. It offers vital insights for policy reform, feminist praxis, and deeper societal reflection.
Research Workshop on School Violence Prevention and Response - BLOG POST
Blog post summarizing key findings from each presentation and highlighting the outstanding research of all participants
Tara Prasad Gnyawali - Narrative
My flashback to working with wildlife-affected communities living in a biological transboundary corridor in Bardiya, Nepal, where I spent my golden 15 years. This story reflects changes that demonstrate how a community's tolerance extends to coexistence, and that is only due to the well-integrated planning of Ecotourism opportunities for the community.
Mehreen Farooq - BLOG
Events
Vacancies
- We’re Hiring: National Evaluation Consultant – Bangladesh
UN Women is recruiting a National Evaluation Consultant (Bangladesh) to support the interim evaluation of the Joint Regional EmPower Programme (Phase II).
This is a great opportunity to work closely with the Evaluation Team Leader and contribute to generating credible, gender-responsive evidence that informs decision-making and strengthens programme impact.
📍 Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh (home-based with travel to project locations)
📅 Apply by: 24 February 2026, 5:00 PM
🔗 Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gar4ciRr
If you are passionate about feminist evaluation, gender equality, and rigorous evidence that drives change (or know someone who is) please apply or share within your networks.
- Seeking Senior Analyst - IPE Global
About the job
IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.
Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.
Role Overview
IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.
Mapping of changes in confidence in evaluations
I have used the confidence mapping exercise to capture changes in confidence of women as a result of a project/programme in evaluations (described below). Are there other methods of capturing changes in confidence of women and sexual minorities? Please revert.
Mapping of Changes in Confidence
Objectives
- To ascertain changes in confidence of the person during the programme or project period
- To ascertain causality of changes in confidence, if any
Assumption
It is premised on the belief that income and poverty measures need not capture confidence of people. Confidence is best captured through qualitative methods than quantitative ones.
Methodology
Confidence mapping entails mapping of whether people are feeling sad, happy or somewhere
in-between in their lives. The evaluator uses this exercise to capture whether participants have become less or more confident as a consequence of joining the project or programme
Method
- Draw a line signifying a scale of 0 to 100 on confidence levels, with 0 signifying low levels of self-confidence and 100 high levels of self confidence
- Ask participant one by one to move on the confidence line from the point they were in terms of their confidence level when they joined the project/programme to where there level of confidence has reached now.
- If culturally appropriate the participant could be asked to take a lamp or candle and walk on the confidence line
- In case their confidence level has improved ask the participant to state why they are stating that their confidence has improved. Cull out gender specific manifestations of increase/decrease in confidence.
- Ask in what way the project has contributed to increase in confidence. Again identify gender specific reasons.
- In case their confidence has not reached 100%, ask what more the project/programme could be doing to increase their confidence to 100%
- Repeat the process for all the participants.
- Analyse gender, caste, class, race, disability etc based differences in response.
Time required
5-10 minutes per participant
Example of use
This method was used to ascertain impact of giving Fellowship to 25 Dalit women in India and giving them capacity building support and mentorship to address violence against Dalit women in the community and in the family. The confidence mapping exercise revealed that the confidence of the Fellows moved from 20% to 65% on the self-confidence line. The increase in self-confidence was reflected in their ability to travel a long distance on their own, elimination of domestic violence in all the Fellows’ households where it existed (33% of Fellows), increase in status within the household and in the community, and ability of a few of them to contest local government elections. The reasons for increase in self-confidence were cited as inputs received from training, financial independence gained through the Fellowship, support received from spouses, investment in higher education through correspondence, gaining knowledge on how to use computers and (last but not the least) support of other Fellows. Initial resistance on the part of some of the in-laws and husbands was overcome by the system of Fellows taking turn to hold monthly state level Fellow’s meetings in each other’s houses. When the in-laws and husbands saw that their daughters-in-law/wives were not alone in doing such kind of work, as well as the respect they commanded in the eyes of other network members the resistance got mitigated
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Shraddha Chigateri on
-
Hello Ranjani
Thank you for initiating this very interesting discussion. Just thinking aloud about what it means to map confidence, and the relation between confidence, happiness and processes of change-
First of all, I think the method of guaging confidence is such a valuable means of assessing the effectiveness of interventions as it captures, as you say, the quality of the intervention, and it provides us with insights on what contributes to change. Moreover, it allows us to assess unintended consequences of interventions, and is also valuable in itself as a marker of change. I also think that all the markers that teh women you talked to, used to reflect on their increase in self-confidence- travelling long distances, elimination of domestic violence, increase in status, participation in political processes- reveal so much of gendered power dynamics.
Thinking through my own limited experience evaluating a youth programme working with dalit youth in Karnataka, I remember the confidence the young men and women derived from community mobilisation and solidarity on issues of caste and gender, and the transgressions of societal norms that those entailed- for instance, revaluing previously denigrated cultural practices- viz., pride in tamate playing (by both young dalit men and women- the women playing the tamate involved so many levels of transgressions), again the confidence gained by their many 'firsts' (many similar to what you indicate)- first time staying out at night, first time reading a newspaper, first one to study in college in the family, first one to travel out of the village, city, state; also, an engagement in politics (again similar to what you say about standing for local elections) but also through an involved engagement in agitations, for instance the arkavathi river campaign, campus agitations.
Just a couple of thoughts though- in this mapping of confidence levels, are we interested really in self-confidence that leads to behavioural change? I suppose the question really is - what is the relationship between self-confidence and behavioural change? Is there something wider than behavioural change that confidence mapping reveals? Also, could changes in political attitudes (awareness), other lifestyle changes (changes in consumption patterns- more ethical sustainbale consumption), etc. be mapped through confidence mapping, or would that be asking too much of this tool?
At another level, another question is whether self-confidence is the same as happiness. Maybe happiness is a marker of confidence and vice versa, but not quite the same thing? Is confidence mapping the same as the happiness index? Is there any use in thinking of the distinctions between the two for the purposes of mapping change 'caused' by interventions?
-
Permalink Reply by Ranjani K.Murthy on
-
Thanks for this very useful reply. I think happiness is to do with emotional well being, while confidence is to do with how one holds oneself vis a vis the others and outside world. Does this make sense? The two are subtly different, yet related. Ranjani
Shraddha Chigateri said:Hello Ranjani
Thank you for initiating this very interesting discussion. Just thinking aloud about what it means to map confidence, and the relation between confidence, happiness and processes of change-
First of all, I think the method of guaging confidence is such a valuable means of assessing the effectiveness of interventions as it captures, as you say, the quality of the intervention, and it provides us with insights on what contributes to change. Moreover, it allows us to assess unintended consequences of interventions, and is also valuable in itself as a marker of change. I also think that all the markers that teh women you talked to, used to reflect on their increase in self-confidence- travelling long distances, elimination of domestic violence, increase in status, participation in political processes- reveal so much of gendered power dynamics.
Thinking through my own limited experience evaluating a youth programme working with dalit youth in Karnataka, I remember the confidence the young men and women derived from community mobilisation and solidarity on issues of caste and gender, and the transgressions of societal norms that those entailed- for instance, revaluing previously denigrated cultural practices- viz., pride in tamate playing (by both young dalit men and women- the women playing the tamate involved so many levels of transgressions), again the confidence gained by their many 'firsts' (many similar to what you indicate)- first time staying out at night, first time reading a newspaper, first one to study in college in the family, first one to travel out of the village, city, state; also, an engagement in politics (again similar to what you say about standing for local elections) but also through an involved engagement in agitations, for instance the arkavathi river campaign, campus agitations.
Just a couple of thoughts though- in this mapping of confidence levels, are we interested really in self-confidence that leads to behavioural change? I suppose the question really is - what is the relationship between self-confidence and behavioural change? Is there something wider than behavioural change that confidence mapping reveals? Also, could changes in political attitudes (awareness), other lifestyle changes (changes in consumption patterns- more ethical sustainbale consumption), etc. be mapped through confidence mapping, or would that be asking too much of this tool?
At another level, another question is whether self-confidence is the same as happiness. Maybe happiness is a marker of confidence and vice versa, but not quite the same thing? Is confidence mapping the same as the happiness index? Is there any use in thinking of the distinctions between the two for the purposes of mapping change 'caused' by interventions?
© 2026 Created by Rituu B Nanda.
Powered by
