Monthly Corner

Astha Ramaiya [Co-author] Shared the Journal Article - Published in Child Abuse & Neglect, June 2026

A new systematic review published in Child Abuse & Neglect examined the link between mental health and technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse (TF-CSEA). Analysing 10 studies with over 25,000 participants across seven countries, researchers found that depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and prior trauma were consistently associated with victimisation. Crucially, the relationship appears bidirectional with mental health difficulties both preceding and resulting from exploitation; creating potential cycles of repeated harm. Perhaps most striking: traditional parental monitoring through technological surveillance showed limited protective effects. What actually mattered? The quality of parent-child relationships including, open communication, emotional warmth, and trust. The findings suggest prevention efforts should combine universal school-based programmes building emotional resilience with targeted support for high-risk youth, while parent education should prioritise connection over control. With 12.5% of children globally experiencing online solicitation annually, understanding these psychological pathways is essential for effective child protection.

Alok Srivastava, Vasanti Rao & Amita Puri Article on International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, January 2026

Tara Prasad Article on Challanges and Lessons Learns of GESI responsive and inclusive conservatiom practices, Nepal

Ritu Dewan & Swati Raju Article on Economic and Political Weekly

Viera Schioppetto shared Thesis on Gender Approach in Development Projects

Events

Vacancies

  • Seeking Senior Analyst - IPE Global

About the job

IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.

Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.

Role Overview

IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.

More Details Please go through

Members

Female Foeticide/Infanticide in India: Considering Relations - Moving towards 'Daughter and Granddaughter Foeticide/Infanticide'

Having recently completed my dissertation on female foeticide and infanticide in India, my research uncovered a key area of neglect in trajectories concerning the practice. My provided an exegesis of  the several structures which exacerbate the practice today: son-preference, dowry, capitalism and 'social engineering' by the British Colonial Authorities in tandem with upper-caste elites to encourage 'Sanskritisation' thereby absolving many lower-caste practices (i.e. bride-price, other marriage types [asura marriage]). 


It also considered a power analysis and the role of gerontocracy and gender within the family and the way in which agreement by women with female foeticide and infanticide often increases with age. Men have often been excluded from research where women tend to be key agents encouraging the foeticide and infanticide. It considered the way in which masculinity plays a role in the practice: where men are economic pillars of a family and often a woman, women need to ensure that their menfolk retain their wealth from which they benefit (as a kind of patriarchal bargain), and a female child (because of dowry) indicates a loss of wealth. A male child also ensures future wellbeing for elderly women and men when men stop working, a woman is therefore in the process of changing her dependence from one male to another. Combined with poorer sex ratios among higher-classes/castes, it may be that greater wealth means women experience this fear of loss more acutely, especially considering that upper-caste norms of Sanskritisation encourage women not to work (lower-caste/class women are more likely to work - a non-working woman is seen with prestige). There are also spiritual reasons emanating from the idea that a male child must light his parent's funeral pyre etc.


While the term 'daughter dis-preference' is being increasingly used in trajectories of female foeticide and infanticide, I suggest this should be used in tandem with 'son-preference' as this is a consequence of the latter. Thus they are both relational to one another in reproducing the practice. Considering the relation of gerontocracy in the family unit to the practice and the way in which some identity is already prescribed to the terms (a gender identity 'female' foeticide/infanticide), the relation of the foetus/child to her family members that reproduce the practice is crucial. Considering relations in a gerontocratic way, the paper argued this represents a case to move towards 'Daughter and Grandaughter Female Foeticide/Infanticide' and to recognise this relations in abolishing the practice -it is too simplistic to focus on gender alone when the practice is discussed and solutions to overcome this practice are presented.




My blog is available at: http://reifiedspeculation.blogspot.in/

Views: 242

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Gender and Evaluation to add comments!

Join Gender and Evaluation

Comment by Ranjani K.Murthy on February 16, 2015 at 15:53

I just read your reply.  So true. Thanks. Ranjani

Comment by John Harvey on February 16, 2015 at 15:51

Dear Rituu - I apologise for my belated reply. I had written a detailed response to you, and where I intended to edit it, I had accidentally deleted it.
The quote you gave is a reference to the way in which research focuses on women in female foeticide trajectories. They look at the victim (girl child, mother) and the perpetrator (mother-in-law). This equally applies to qualitative and quantitative research. My thesis therefore proposes a masculinities inclusive approach. In patriarchal societies, men always have greater structural power than women, and so they might posses power to the stop the practice. The silence of men in research therefore may indicate that they approve of this practice because it is one way of allowing them to maintain this structural power. Note that the statistics show that with increasing wealth and higher caste status, the practice appears to be more common - there is therefore more to loose.
It is therefore a way of maintaining structural power because women are an economic disadvantage (marrying out, dowry) - less daughters means greater retention of money (this can be related to breadwinner masculinities etc.). There are several other reasons that can be applied here.

Comment by Rituu B Nanda on February 1, 2015 at 20:10

Hi John, thanks for posting. Please could you elaborate on -Men have often been excluded from research where women tend to be key agents encouraging the foeticide and infanticide.

Comment by John Harvey on January 30, 2015 at 21:33

Thank you Ranjani for your comments. 

So the data I found which interviewed women only was revealing a trend that with increasing age group there is greater support for the practice. I proposed that this is because Indian society is run generally upon gerontocratic lines - meaning that with age, one will support a practice which is more beneficial to them.

Thus, a mother in law ensures future safety of her son by ensuring her daughter in law has a grand child and also that the name carries on.

A daughter in law has to worry about securing her son for well being in own age but is not so close to the age period where she might be considering this more, and since she is giving birth she might be more emotionally attached.

A girl or unmarried young woman might be least likely to agree because she is the closest to a newborn of the categories and may realise that the foetus could well have been her. Also being unmarried she is not subject to the same family pressures and might not be considering her future dependency as she would be still dependant on her parents at that time.

Comment by Ranjani K.Murthy on January 30, 2015 at 15:36

Great piece, John.

You have mentioned "It also considered a power analysis and the role of gerontocracy and gender within the family and the way in which agreement by women with female foeticide and infanticide often increases with age" . Can you explain why it increases with age 

Exploration of this practice in other countries without dowry etc would be useful. 

Best 

Ranjani

© 2026   Created by Rituu B Nanda.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service