Laura Hughston - Blog
Arnoux Mouafo Nopi & Dimitri Tsona Zapzi - Article
Prof. Wangari Mwai and Prof. Catherine Ndungo - BOOK
RAI SENGUPTA - gender-transformative evaluation tools
This synthesis draws on evidence from 17 humanitarian evaluations across diverse crisis settings. It identifies key feminist evaluation innovations across four domains - design, methods, analysis, and ethics - illustrating how feminist principles can be embedded throughout the evaluation process. It also surfaces broader shifts required at policy, institutional, and practice levels to realise the transformative potential of feminist approaches in humanitarian contexts.
The toolkit translates these insights into applied guidance for evaluators and organisations. It provides step-by-step support across the full evaluation cycle, including planning, design, methods, analysis, ethics, and dissemination. Drawing on global feminist evaluation practice, humanitarian guidance, and gender evaluation standards, it includes adaptable tools, participatory and arts-based methods, guiding questions, and templates for field application.
Ritu Dewan & Swat Raju - Article
In Promises & Reality 2026 Citizen’s Review of Year 2 of the NDA-III Government. Coordinated by Wada Na Todo Abhiyan, June 20, 2026. pp 94-100.
UTTHAN - Research Report
Traversing the path with women farmers in their fields and in our reflections/writings, a stark observation was the sheer lack of localized and regional vocabulary and terminology to adequately capture and communicate the understanding of climate change and mitigation strategies, informed by the unique experiences and needs of small and marginal women farmers. This is what propelled our research - to examine how women farmers perceive, express, experience, and respond to climate variability across
Our Research Report centres the lived experiences, generational knowledge, and resilience strategies of small and marginal women farmers from the coastal (Bhavnagar) and hilly (Dahod & Panchmahal) regions i.e two contrasting agro-climatic zones of Gujarat. Through their voices, the study reveals exactly how climate change intersects with gender, land rights, labour burdens, and food security.
At Includovate, we are expanding our Pacific Research & Evaluation Talent Pool and inviting researchers, evaluators, consultants, and development practitioners to join a growing network of professionals committed to creating meaningful social impact.
As a feminist research incubator and certified social enterprise, Includovate works with partners including UNICEF, UNFPA, the ILO, governments, and development organisations across 23+ countries. Our work spans gender equality, social inclusion, health, disability, youth, climate, WASH, market systems, and other development priorities.
We are particularly keen to connect with experts from:
📍 Papua New Guinea
📍 Solomon Islands
📍 Vanuatu
📍 Timor-Leste
📍 Fiji
📍 Samoa
📍 Tonga
📍 Indonesia
📍 Australia
and across the wider Pacific region.
We welcome expertise in:
✓ Research, Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning
✓ Gender Equality & Social Inclusion
✓ Health & SRHR
✓ Disability Inclusion
✓ Youth Development
✓ Climate & Environment
✓ WASH
✓ Market Systems Development
✓ Governance & Community Development
Whether your expertise lies in data collection, research, evaluation, technical advisory, facilitation, or team leadership, we would love to hear from you.
By joining our Talent Pool, you become part of a trusted network of professionals who may be considered for future research, evaluation, advisory, and consulting opportunities across the Pacific region and beyond.
🔗 Register here: https://lnkd.in/eyF66S7H
Add a Comment
I just read your reply. So true. Thanks. Ranjani
Dear Rituu - I apologise for my belated reply. I had written a detailed response to you, and where I intended to edit it, I had accidentally deleted it.
The quote you gave is a reference to the way in which research focuses on women in female foeticide trajectories. They look at the victim (girl child, mother) and the perpetrator (mother-in-law). This equally applies to qualitative and quantitative research. My thesis therefore proposes a masculinities inclusive approach. In patriarchal societies, men always have greater structural power than women, and so they might posses power to the stop the practice. The silence of men in research therefore may indicate that they approve of this practice because it is one way of allowing them to maintain this structural power. Note that the statistics show that with increasing wealth and higher caste status, the practice appears to be more common - there is therefore more to loose.
It is therefore a way of maintaining structural power because women are an economic disadvantage (marrying out, dowry) - less daughters means greater retention of money (this can be related to breadwinner masculinities etc.). There are several other reasons that can be applied here.
Hi John, thanks for posting. Please could you elaborate on -Men have often been excluded from research where women tend to be key agents encouraging the foeticide and infanticide.
Thank you Ranjani for your comments.
So the data I found which interviewed women only was revealing a trend that with increasing age group there is greater support for the practice. I proposed that this is because Indian society is run generally upon gerontocratic lines - meaning that with age, one will support a practice which is more beneficial to them.
Thus, a mother in law ensures future safety of her son by ensuring her daughter in law has a grand child and also that the name carries on.
A daughter in law has to worry about securing her son for well being in own age but is not so close to the age period where she might be considering this more, and since she is giving birth she might be more emotionally attached.
A girl or unmarried young woman might be least likely to agree because she is the closest to a newborn of the categories and may realise that the foetus could well have been her. Also being unmarried she is not subject to the same family pressures and might not be considering her future dependency as she would be still dependant on her parents at that time.
Great piece, John.
You have mentioned "It also considered a power analysis and the role of gerontocracy and gender within the family and the way in which agreement by women with female foeticide and infanticide often increases with age" . Can you explain why it increases with age
Exploration of this practice in other countries without dowry etc would be useful.
Best
Ranjani
© 2026 Created by Rituu B Nanda.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Gender and Evaluation to add comments!
Join Gender and Evaluation