Monthly Corner
Astha Ramaiya [Co-author] Shared the Journal Article - Published in Child Abuse & Neglect, June 2026
A new systematic review published in Child Abuse & Neglect examined the link between mental health and technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse (TF-CSEA). Analysing 10 studies with over 25,000 participants across seven countries, researchers found that depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and prior trauma were consistently associated with victimisation. Crucially, the relationship appears bidirectional with mental health difficulties both preceding and resulting from exploitation; creating potential cycles of repeated harm. Perhaps most striking: traditional parental monitoring through technological surveillance showed limited protective effects. What actually mattered? The quality of parent-child relationships including, open communication, emotional warmth, and trust. The findings suggest prevention efforts should combine universal school-based programmes building emotional resilience with targeted support for high-risk youth, while parent education should prioritise connection over control. With 12.5% of children globally experiencing online solicitation annually, understanding these psychological pathways is essential for effective child protection.
Alok Srivastava, Vasanti Rao & Amita Puri Article on International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, January 2026
Tara Prasad Article on Challanges and Lessons Learns of GESI responsive and inclusive conservatiom practices, Nepal
Ritu Dewan & Swati Raju Article on Economic and Political Weekly
Viera Schioppetto shared Thesis on Gender Approach in Development Projects
Events
Vacancies
- Seeking Senior Analyst - IPE Global
About the job
IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.
Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.
Role Overview
IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.
Locating gender equality in evaluations: Choosing pathways
Since the popularity emergence of gender and development approach in the late 1980s, there have been debates on where and how to locate gender equality in evaluations.
At one end, most multi-lateral development banks do not have a separate evaluation criterion on gender equality. The focus is on relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and (some impacts). Evaluation reports indicate that gender equality issues tend to be integrated into relevance, effectiveness, impacts and less into efficiency and sustainability and project/program performance.
On the other hand, UN agencies tend to have a separate criterion on gender equality, and bulk of gender analysis of outcomes, impact and project performance is in this section with varying integration in other evaluation criteria like relevance and effectiveness.
While proponents of both sides argue that their approach is appropriate, the choice of gender equality as an exclusive evaluation criterion must depend on the mandate of the organization. If the mandate includes gender equality, it makes sense to have gender equality a separate criterion, and integrate it within other criteria. However, if the mandate of the organization does not include gender equality, it makes sense to integrate gender equality into criteria of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability, and impact.
Either way, gender equality issues to be explored have expanded since the 1990s. The major shifts that needed to be taken in evaluations are
· Addressing gender and intersectional discrimination: It is not adequate if evaluations explore outcomes for, and impact on, women vis-a-vis men, but impact on different groups of marginalized women (migrant, indigenous, Dalits, disabled, ethnic religious minorities etc.) and vis-a-vis dominant men. The discussion must go beyond social inclusion, and to address unique forms of discrimination faced by women of above groups
· Addressing gender transformation: Gender equality can be achieved sustained only when gender norms, power and institutions change. Assessing changes in these aspects is critical, and demands dialogue with non-members, non-project stakeholders as well. Further some norms are easier to change while others are sticky (including intersectional ones), this also must be assessed
· Gender beyond binary Evaluations, like planning and monitoring, have historically looked at gender as binary. This has excluded people of diverse sexual orientation and gender identities. It is important to assess how far the project design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation look at gender beyond family
· Gender/social transformation methodologies: The evaluation theory of change and evaluation matrix should raise questions around gender equality, transformation, and intersectionality Evaluation frameworks and methods that are gender/socially transformative and look beyond binary should be adopted. This includes using the change matrix, social relations framework, social equality assessment tool for analysis and other frameworks. Sampling and methods should address gender/intersectional concerns.
· Reports should include conclusions and recommendations around gender transformation Evaluations should ideally offer conclusions on performance on gender/social transformation, and ways forward to address shortcomings.
Accountability to marginalized women: Findings, conclusions should be taken back to women from marginalized groups for inputs and validation, and not just to project holders and government.
Evaluations are political and reflect gender and other hierarchies, while challenging them. To be aware of this at every stage of evaluation is important
Cross posted from: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/locating-gender-equality-evaluations...
Add a Comment
© 2026 Created by Rituu B Nanda.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Gender and Evaluation to add comments!
Join Gender and Evaluation