Laura Hughston - Blog
Arnoux Mouafo Nopi & Dimitri Tsona Zapzi - Article
Prof. Wangari Mwai and Prof. Catherine Ndungo - BOOK
RAI SENGUPTA - gender-transformative evaluation tools
This synthesis draws on evidence from 17 humanitarian evaluations across diverse crisis settings. It identifies key feminist evaluation innovations across four domains - design, methods, analysis, and ethics - illustrating how feminist principles can be embedded throughout the evaluation process. It also surfaces broader shifts required at policy, institutional, and practice levels to realise the transformative potential of feminist approaches in humanitarian contexts.
The toolkit translates these insights into applied guidance for evaluators and organisations. It provides step-by-step support across the full evaluation cycle, including planning, design, methods, analysis, ethics, and dissemination. Drawing on global feminist evaluation practice, humanitarian guidance, and gender evaluation standards, it includes adaptable tools, participatory and arts-based methods, guiding questions, and templates for field application.
Ritu Dewan & Swat Raju - Article
In Promises & Reality 2026 Citizen’s Review of Year 2 of the NDA-III Government. Coordinated by Wada Na Todo Abhiyan, June 20, 2026. pp 94-100.
UTTHAN - Research Report
Traversing the path with women farmers in their fields and in our reflections/writings, a stark observation was the sheer lack of localized and regional vocabulary and terminology to adequately capture and communicate the understanding of climate change and mitigation strategies, informed by the unique experiences and needs of small and marginal women farmers. This is what propelled our research - to examine how women farmers perceive, express, experience, and respond to climate variability across
Our Research Report centres the lived experiences, generational knowledge, and resilience strategies of small and marginal women farmers from the coastal (Bhavnagar) and hilly (Dahod & Panchmahal) regions i.e two contrasting agro-climatic zones of Gujarat. Through their voices, the study reveals exactly how climate change intersects with gender, land rights, labour burdens, and food security.
At Includovate, we are expanding our Pacific Research & Evaluation Talent Pool and inviting researchers, evaluators, consultants, and development practitioners to join a growing network of professionals committed to creating meaningful social impact.
As a feminist research incubator and certified social enterprise, Includovate works with partners including UNICEF, UNFPA, the ILO, governments, and development organisations across 23+ countries. Our work spans gender equality, social inclusion, health, disability, youth, climate, WASH, market systems, and other development priorities.
We are particularly keen to connect with experts from:
📍 Papua New Guinea
📍 Solomon Islands
📍 Vanuatu
📍 Timor-Leste
📍 Fiji
📍 Samoa
📍 Tonga
📍 Indonesia
📍 Australia
and across the wider Pacific region.
We welcome expertise in:
✓ Research, Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning
✓ Gender Equality & Social Inclusion
✓ Health & SRHR
✓ Disability Inclusion
✓ Youth Development
✓ Climate & Environment
✓ WASH
✓ Market Systems Development
✓ Governance & Community Development
Whether your expertise lies in data collection, research, evaluation, technical advisory, facilitation, or team leadership, we would love to hear from you.
By joining our Talent Pool, you become part of a trusted network of professionals who may be considered for future research, evaluation, advisory, and consulting opportunities across the Pacific region and beyond.
🔗 Register here: https://lnkd.in/eyF66S7H
We at the Institute of Social Studies Trust invited Ranjani Murthy, feminist researcher and evaluator, to our workshop to share the participatory evaluation tools that she uses when she conducts evaluations. While many of these tools are used in participatory research and evaluations, our interest in these tools was to understand how these tools maybe used for gender sensitive and feminist evaluations. We are pleased to share with you the edited videos of the training, Ranjani conducted with us. We are sharing this in four parts. We are grateful to both Ranjani Murthy and to all our workshop participants for their contribution.
This is third part of the toolkit which demonstrates the tool called Body Mapping.
Request for your experiences, so that we can learn from each other. Thanks!
Add a Comment
Dear Bhabtosh
This tool is firstly not developed me, I have adapted it for evaluations.
There has to be some rapport and trust before facilitating body mapping. Privacy and consent has to be ensured, and it is best done individually. The sex of the facilitator should be the same as the sex of the participant. Literacy is not a barrier. Yes it can be used with men, though I have to admit that I have never tried it. I have facilitated body mapping in parts of rural Bangladesh (Barisal), in addition to rural/urban India. Though I would think a bit if I were in Sylhet. So while agreeing with you that context matters, I would not generalise that it cannot be facilitated with one community.
I like your observations on interpreting body language in FGDs used for evaluations from a gender lens. You should perhaps write a piece on that. However, it may not throw up some intimate aspects which emerge in body mapping when done individually.
Role plays ofcourse lead to many qualitative gender/diversity issues emerging, and before and after situations could be analysed. I still like body mapping because it goes one step further - and issues in the realm of intimacy emerge. However, it cannot be done in a group like role play. THUS ALL GENDER-SENSITIVE PARTICIPATORY METHODS HAVE PROS AND CONS.
Bhabtosh- please write on how role plays can be used in evaluation. I really like the distinction Dheka Mair and Chipa Mair.
Thanks so much
Ranjani
Dear Bhabatosh
Thanks for your message- a detailed reply follows tom
Ranjani
Devashish- thanks so much. my email rk_km2000@yahoo.com. Please cc to Rituu. thanks
Ranjani
Thanks are due to Ranjani Murthy for delivering her presentation on "Body Mapping". It is surely an effective tool. But it is not equally applicable to the people of all types and not applicable in all areas in terms of geographical area, special religious and cultural area and the venue of the session to be facilitated. One query is- regarding type of 'participants' mentioned in the tool, are all of them female? male? or mixed group? This is also a concerning issues for using the tool in a session. I think the 'Body Mapping' tool is more feasible for the educated and 'free-minded' people. This tool could easily be used for the students at university and college level. But it would be very tough (and tricky) to use this tool at grassroots level. For example, like our country in Bangladesh, in most cases it is impossible to request a female participant in rural areas to 'lie down' on the ground /or on the table....and to know about their 'feelings' on different 'parts' of their body!
However, to some extent, related to 'Body Mapping', in some of the evaluation study, in the field (grassroots level~ rural areas) we use some techniques through deliberating 'body language'. For an example, when we facilitate the focus group discussion (FGD) session, we ask the female participants (of 12 females in a session) whether they are happy in their family life with their husbands and in-laws, whether there exists family harmony. If the answer is 'yes' then we request the respondents to show how much they are happy with this. Females show it with their two hands expanding to their left and right. Some expand the hands in a bigger way, some in medium and some in a small way. And then we as facilitators ask about the reasons behind these different types of 'happiness'. In the same way, those say about 'unhappiness', they also show their status by hands and disclose the reasons against different types of 'unhappiness'. We find it very appropriate and effective to measure the situation of the women in their family.
In one session we asked a group of women about women's violation at family level. One woman expressed that there are two types of violation. In Bangla language, she said about (a) Dekha mair (means physical torture i.e. that can be seen/ known/explored by others), (b) Chipa mair (means mental torture, which the others easily don't know, but the woman has to carry unbearable pain inside her). When asked, women in group showed their situation through 'role play'. That's also an effective way to make others understand about the situation and helps to develop awareness of the participants in a session, and it could be applied both for female and male in separate sessions and also in together as in mixed group!
I have just shared my field experience. It might be coincided with the tool 'Body Mapping' or one could compare and linked with different tools to use appropriately at participants level. This also relates to the 'Facilitation skills' of the evaluator /facilitator. And I personally emphasize to apply the appropriate tools at grassroots level as a major percentage of participants are living in that level.
Dear Pramada
Thanks. Yes, normally it is used in training on gender and sexuality. But I have modified and used also for evaluations.
Best
Ranjani
From Facebook of CREA. Thanks Pramada for sharing!
Pramada Menon interesting to see this being used for evaluations. have used this exercise more for trainings on gender and sexuality to get participants to open up to issues around disability, body image, pleasure and so on. never used as a one on one exercise but more as a large group exercise to reduce the shame that one feels around the body
Dear Devashish
Do your facilitate body mapping after ice-breaking or some other sessions or do you begin with body-mapping? Is the process separate for boys and girls or together? Do the responses differ between girls and boys, rural and urban of different castes? Do share it would be useful
Ranjani
From Facebook of CREA. Thanks Devashish for sharing!
Devashish Daryl Dutta We at Calcutta University using Body Mapping with Adolescent Children. It works really miracle and actually the facilitators even are shocked with the data and the queries from the boys and girls comes after the session.
© 2026 Created by Rituu B Nanda.
Powered by
You need to be a member of Gender and Evaluation to add comments!
Join Gender and Evaluation