IDH Publication, 2026
Gender-Based Violence (GBV) is not just a social issue, it’s a systemic challenge that undermines agricultural value chains.
In rural and isolated areas, GBV threatens women’s safety, limits their economic participation, and weakens food security. When women cannot work safely, entire communities lose resilience, and businesses lose productivity. Climate resilience strategies that overlook gendered risks leave communities exposed and women vulnerable.
Ending GBV is essential for building equitable, sustainable, and climate-resilient agri-food systems; and it’s not only a human rights imperative, but also central to climate adaptation and economic stability.
The good news? Solutions work. Programs like the Women’s Safety Accelerator Fund (WSAF) demonstrate that addressing GBV can enhance productivity and strengthen workforce morale and brand reputation. Safe, inclusive workplaces aren’t just good ethics, they’re smart business.
Gurmeet Kaur Articles
Luc Barriere-Constantin Article
This article draws on the experience gained by The Constellation over the past 20 years. It is also a proposal for a new M&E and Learning framework to be adopted and adapted in future projects of all community-focused organisations.
Devaka K.C. Article
Sudeshna Sengupta Chapter in the book "Dialogues on Development edited by Prof Arash Faizli and Prof Amitabh Kundu."
UN Women is recruiting a National Evaluation Consultant (Bangladesh) to support the interim evaluation of the Joint Regional EmPower Programme (Phase II).
This is a great opportunity to work closely with the Evaluation Team Leader and contribute to generating credible, gender-responsive evidence that informs decision-making and strengthens programme impact.
📍 Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh (home-based with travel to project locations)
📅 Apply by: 24 February 2026, 5:00 PM
🔗 Apply here: https://lnkd.in/gar4ciRr
If you are passionate about feminist evaluation, gender equality, and rigorous evidence that drives change (or know someone who is) please apply or share within your networks.
IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.
Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.
Role Overview
IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.
Dear colleagues, I am seeking to get insight into how to measure/evaluate behavioural change in response to a capacity building intervention in the agriculture sector. I would be grateful if someone could please share with me your thoughts on the topic. I look forward to hearing from you.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Kaleab Kebede Haile on December 7, 2020 at 22:16 Hi Archana, thanks for your explanation. How can I infere behavioural change by making use of observational data on actual practices? Do I need to set standards?
Please, all the stuff you have read, set them aside for now (The stuff might help anyway). But get this: If you know the difference between attitude and behaviour, logically you can measure either attitudinal change or behavioural change without stress.
Attitude is more or less an intension while behavour is an action. Attitude (intension) is a good predictive factor of behaviour (action) but may not necessarily lead to behaviour (action). Now apply this to your query, you want to measure/evaluate the change of actions that have taken place in response to a capacity building intervention in the agriculture sector. Please, questions that must be used for the scale of measurement should be action specific or oriented. Let me give you an insight: 1. You had used cutlass and hoes on the farm before, have you started using tractors? Here, you want to measure the change of action (positive or negative) that have taken place after you have built their capacity in the use of modern farm equipment. 2. If it is attitude (intention) you want to measure, you will ask: Will you use tractors in future? Or will you now use tractors? Here, you want to measure the intention (positive or negative)
Now, there are different types of capacity. You need to know the type of capacity that was built. Is it personal capacity or system capacity or workload capacity or structural capacity or role capacity or performance capacity or support capacity etc. If you know the type(s) of capacity that was/were built, you will tailor your behavioural (action) questions in line with the type(s). The example I gave above has to do with Performance Capacity since the question dealt with EQUIPMENT.
In case of evaluation, your INDICATORS of achievement must reflect what I wrote above. I said this because you are not measuring outcomes, you are measuring impacts. Why? Behavioural (Action) What change of action has taken place? And since the issue here is specific and not general, you don't need any CONTROL STUDY.
Regards, respect and much love from Nigeria.
MOSH
Permalink Reply by Kaleab Kebede Haile on December 7, 2020 at 22:10 Hi Folorunsho, if I get your response correctly, are you suggesting the Knowledge, Attitude (intention) and Practice (action) framework? Or is there more to it?
Dear Kaleab:
You did not get it because I never mentioned knowledge and practice to you. Read my suggestion very well and show me those two words (knowledge and practice) you used. However, if it is knowledge you want to measure, it is as simple as ABC, all your questions for the measuring scale will be close-ended and the answers will be monosyllabic (Yes or No). Why? Measuring knowledge is about whether you know the subject matter or not. But your work is on behavioural change and not on knowledge, not on practice. It is all about action(s) carried out.
Read my suggestion with rapt attention to understand it. Thanks
Dear Rituu and Kaeab,
If the attached document help for requested insights, please refer it.CLA-Geteneh%20Moges.pdf
Permalink Reply by Kaleab Kebede Haile on December 7, 2020 at 22:11 Thanks Geteneh, I will surely take a look at it.
Thanks Anirban, Geteneh, Michael, Moshood, Pramod, and Shankar for your prompt response. I appreciate it very much.
Hi Kaleab
Have you heard of "Most Significant Change"? It is a methodology developed by two evaluators who devised initially for agricultural extension projects - see The 'Most Significant Change' Technique - A Guide to Its Use | Bett... and MSC_finalextra_single (mande.co.uk)
It has been used extensively here in Australia by Dr Jessica Dart and overseas by her colleague Dr Rick Davies. Best of luck
Larraine Larri
Permalink Reply by Kaleab Kebede Haile on December 8, 2020 at 20:18 Hi Larraine! I hadn't heard of it, but now that has changed. Thank you for introducing me to an additional approach (tool) for measuring behavioural change.
© 2026 Created by Rituu B Nanda.
Powered by