Monthly Corner
Laura Hughston - Blog
Arnoux Mouafo Nop & Dimitri Tsona Zapzi - Article
Prof. Wangari Mwai and Prof. Catherine Ndungo - BOOK
- Understanding Gender and Identity Through The Gender Dictionary
Publisher: Bleeding Ink Scribes
RAI SENGUPTA - gender-transformative evaluation tools
This synthesis draws on evidence from 17 humanitarian evaluations across diverse crisis settings. It identifies key feminist evaluation innovations across four domains - design, methods, analysis, and ethics - illustrating how feminist principles can be embedded throughout the evaluation process. It also surfaces broader shifts required at policy, institutional, and practice levels to realise the transformative potential of feminist approaches in humanitarian contexts.
The toolkit translates these insights into applied guidance for evaluators and organisations. It provides step-by-step support across the full evaluation cycle, including planning, design, methods, analysis, ethics, and dissemination. Drawing on global feminist evaluation practice, humanitarian guidance, and gender evaluation standards, it includes adaptable tools, participatory and arts-based methods, guiding questions, and templates for field application.
Ritu Dewan & Swat Raju - Article
-
In Promises & Reality 2026 Citizen’s Review of Year 2 of the NDA-III Government. Coordinated by Wada Na Todo Abhiyan, June 20, 2026. pp 94-100.
UTTHAN - Research Report
Traversing the path with women farmers in their fields and in our reflections/writings, a stark observation was the sheer lack of localized and regional vocabulary and terminology to adequately capture and communicate the understanding of climate change and mitigation strategies, informed by the unique experiences and needs of small and marginal women farmers. This is what propelled our research - to examine how women farmers perceive, express, experience, and respond to climate variability across
Our Research Report centres the lived experiences, generational knowledge, and resilience strategies of small and marginal women farmers from the coastal (Bhavnagar) and hilly (Dahod & Panchmahal) regions i.e two contrasting agro-climatic zones of Gujarat. Through their voices, the study reveals exactly how climate change intersects with gender, land rights, labour burdens, and food security.
Events
Vacancies
About the job
At Includovate, we are expanding our Pacific Research & Evaluation Talent Pool and inviting researchers, evaluators, consultants, and development practitioners to join a growing network of professionals committed to creating meaningful social impact.
As a feminist research incubator and certified social enterprise, Includovate works with partners including UNICEF, UNFPA, the ILO, governments, and development organisations across 23+ countries. Our work spans gender equality, social inclusion, health, disability, youth, climate, WASH, market systems, and other development priorities.
We are particularly keen to connect with experts from:
📍 Papua New Guinea
📍 Solomon Islands
📍 Vanuatu
📍 Timor-Leste
📍 Fiji
📍 Samoa
📍 Tonga
📍 Indonesia
📍 Australia
and across the wider Pacific region.
We welcome expertise in:
✓ Research, Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning
✓ Gender Equality & Social Inclusion
✓ Health & SRHR
✓ Disability Inclusion
✓ Youth Development
✓ Climate & Environment
✓ WASH
✓ Market Systems Development
✓ Governance & Community Development
Whether your expertise lies in data collection, research, evaluation, technical advisory, facilitation, or team leadership, we would love to hear from you.
By joining our Talent Pool, you become part of a trusted network of professionals who may be considered for future research, evaluation, advisory, and consulting opportunities across the Pacific region and beyond.
🔗 Register here: https://lnkd.in/eyF66S7H
quick poverty assessment tools
Dear community members
I will be going on a project design mission where I will need to do quick assessments of poverty levels in many villages with groups. Though good poverty assessments take time, I need some ideas for quick time-efficient ways to do participatory assessments. Would love to hear from any one if they have any ideas.
Thanks
Judith
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Rituu B Nanda on
-
Hi Judith,
I have no experience in this area and therefore have sent a request to the community.
Warmly,
Rituu
-
Permalink Reply by Saeid Nouri Neshat on
-
In a community-based poverty reduction project in Iran, where I was involved as a trainer/facilitator (and not in an evaluation team), I found that the focus of the participatory evaluation was on the capacities of the community group. The group had to have enough capacity to continue and deal with poverty issues in their own community. They used FGD with certain questions (I do not have the questions) and with participation of all group members and some of the community members. I do not have more information.
-
Permalink Reply by Ranjani K.Murthy on
-
Hi judith. nice to see you here. I think I used this in WB when you were there with me but not sure.
Gender integrated wealth ranking
Objectives:
- To ascertain changes in economic status of households during the programme or project period, and explore reasons for these changes
- To explore whether headship has a bearing on economic status of households as well as how much women headed households have been able to benefit out of the project/programme
- To explore whether caste, religion, ethnicity, disability and land holding have a bearing on how much households have been able to benefit out of the project
- To explore non project/programme factors (in particular gender specific ones) that have had a bearing on changes in economic status over time
Assumption
There is gender, class, caste, ethnicity, religion and other stratification which mediate economic well-being of households and how far women can benefit out of a project/programmes. The extent of economic benefit derived by a household out of a project or programme is best captured through a participatory exercise.
Methodology
Changes in wealth/economic ranking entails participatory mapping of what changes have occurred in economic status of participant household during the project period, and the reasons for the same.
Method
- Request the women participants (around 20 to 25) to bring stones of four different sizes.
- Place the stones in a straight line
- Explain that the small stone signifies the very poor, the second big one the poor, the third big stone moderately off and the fourth stone the economically rich.
- Ask the participants what criteria they would adopt to classify a household as very poor, poor, moderate and economically rich.
- 5. Ask the participants to classify themselves into one of these categories. Give each of them a piece of paper or a card. Request them to draw land on the paper if they have land, draw livestock if they have, indicate the nature of housing, use a particular colour pen if they come from a marginalised community and use a particular symbol if heading the household.
- 6. If it is not culturally appropriate to find out caste, ethnicity, headship etc do it later taking the support of the community worker of the implementing agency.
- 7. Ask the participants what was their economic status before joining the project/programme
- 8. If there has been an improvement or deterioration, explore the reasons- both project/programme related and those which do not relate to the project.
- 9. Help the participants discern patterns- Who has benefitted most? Who has deteriorated most? Landed or landless, women heading households or women in male headed households, dalits/Adivasis/Muslims or the upper castes?
- 10. Help the participants identify gender specific reasons for improvement or deterioration (e.g. dowry, alcoholism, desertion/divorce etc.)
- 11. Find out interventions that are necessary for those who are very poor or poor now to come out of their poverty in a sustained manner.
Time required
One and a half hours
Materials required
Stones of four different sizes
Cards
Adapted from
Program on Forests (PROFOR),n.d, Tool 1: Wealth ranking: Conducted with the Village Leadership, http://www.profor.info/sites/profor.info/files/PFL_Tool_01_07-01.pdf Last accessed February 19th, 2013
Illustration
Economic ranking in a predominantly Muslim village: Eastern UP
Economic Category
No. of members across different categories at present
No of members across different categories before group formation
Very poor
Nil
4
Poor
2
3
Moderate
8
3
Rich
Total
2
12
2
12
Total number of households improved: 11
Profile of households improved:
- Women headed households (Saithwar community): 03
- SC households: Not applicable
- Minority households: 8
Number of HHs improved because of SHG-micro credit activities: 03
Number of HHs improved because of SHG-micro credit with agricultural/activities: 08
Number improved because of agricultural activities alone: Nil
Number improved because of other factors: Nil
Total number of persons deteriorated: 1
No. deteriorated because of failure of activities initiated with group loan Nil
No. deteriorated because of failure of other GEAG activities Nil
No. deteriorated because of other reasons 1 (Dowry)
Source: GEAG, 2004, Wealth ranking exercise with Peerbaba SHG formed by Gorakhpur Environment Action Group, in Tenua Vishambharpur SHG 2004 (mimeo),
REFERENCE
MURTHY, forthcoming, Toolkit for Participatory and Gender Aware Evaluation Methods, Indian Social Studies Trust, New Delhi
-
Permalink Reply by Dr. SRIDHAR SEETHARAMAN on
-
Respected Group Colleague,
Glad to know that you are undertaking a poverty assessment survey of villages dominated by Self Help Groups. One of the quickest measure of Poverty Assessment has been the Per Capita Expenditure Pattern in a family and then grade them. This is the fastest measure that we have today and would enable one to know also where the expenditure is flowing. Any further clarification, if needed, could be provided. Wishing you the best of luck in your research.
Sridhar.
-
Permalink Reply by Pramod Sharma on
-
Dear Members,
Greetings!
Participatory methods are good as other members have said.
Poverty ranking or wealth ranking can be done in villages with different groups or with 4-5 key informants.
Household survey is also an option. I have found some material during my search on internet. which I am sharing with you.
In my opinion, Combination of a survey with participatory wealth ranking is a good.
In participatory methods many times people (group) care too much about person's historic background and other social factors.
Regards,
Pramod
-
Permalink Reply by Joseph Robert BUGEMBE on
-
Depending on your specific poverty info needs p'se remember to capture data using the 4 categories of PRA tools useful for participatory poverty assessment - tools for Spatial Analysis [access to resources and services]; Time trend Analysis [determine the variables to subject to analysis and the time frame(s) within which comparisons will be made]; Relational Analysis [e.g. the relative importance and relationships between and among institutions, livelihood strategies, etc]; and Priority Analysis [of needs, challenges and actions/interventions etc]...
-
Permalink Reply by Judith D'Souza on
-
Thanks Rituu for posting this.
Judith
Rituu B Nanda said:Hi Judith,
I have no experience in this area and therefore have sent a request to the community.
Warmly,
Rituu
-
-
Thanks Ranjani, Yes I remember this in the WB mission but had forgot the finer details .. Will need to tweak it a bit to suit a design mission.
Judith
Ranjani K.Murthy said:Hi judith. nice to see you here. I think I used this in WB when you were there with me but not sure.
Gender integrated wealth ranking
Objectives:
- To ascertain changes in economic status of households during the programme or project period, and explore reasons for these changes
- To explore whether headship has a bearing on economic status of households as well as how much women headed households have been able to benefit out of the project/programme
- To explore whether caste, religion, ethnicity, disability and land holding have a bearing on how much households have been able to benefit out of the project
- To explore non project/programme factors (in particular gender specific ones) that have had a bearing on changes in economic status over time
Assumption
There is gender, class, caste, ethnicity, religion and other stratification which mediate economic well-being of households and how far women can benefit out of a project/programmes. The extent of economic benefit derived by a household out of a project or programme is best captured through a participatory exercise.
Methodology
Changes in wealth/economic ranking entails participatory mapping of what changes have occurred in economic status of participant household during the project period, and the reasons for the same.
Method
- Request the women participants (around 20 to 25) to bring stones of four different sizes.
- Place the stones in a straight line
- Explain that the small stone signifies the very poor, the second big one the poor, the third big stone moderately off and the fourth stone the economically rich.
- Ask the participants what criteria they would adopt to classify a household as very poor, poor, moderate and economically rich.
- 5. Ask the participants to classify themselves into one of these categories. Give each of them a piece of paper or a card. Request them to draw land on the paper if they have land, draw livestock if they have, indicate the nature of housing, use a particular colour pen if they come from a marginalised community and use a particular symbol if heading the household.
- 6. If it is not culturally appropriate to find out caste, ethnicity, headship etc do it later taking the support of the community worker of the implementing agency.
- 7. Ask the participants what was their economic status before joining the project/programme
- 8. If there has been an improvement or deterioration, explore the reasons- both project/programme related and those which do not relate to the project.
- 9. Help the participants discern patterns- Who has benefitted most? Who has deteriorated most? Landed or landless, women heading households or women in male headed households, dalits/Adivasis/Muslims or the upper castes?
- 10. Help the participants identify gender specific reasons for improvement or deterioration (e.g. dowry, alcoholism, desertion/divorce etc.)
- 11. Find out interventions that are necessary for those who are very poor or poor now to come out of their poverty in a sustained manner.
Time required
One and a half hours
Materials required
Stones of four different sizes
Cards
Adapted from
Program on Forests (PROFOR),n.d, Tool 1: Wealth ranking: Conducted with the Village Leadership, http://www.profor.info/sites/profor.info/files/PFL_Tool_01_07-01.pdf Last accessed February 19th, 2013
Illustration
Economic ranking in a predominantly Muslim village: Eastern UP
Economic Category
No. of members across different categories at present
No of members across different categories before group formation
Very poor
Nil
4
Poor
2
3
Moderate
8
3
Rich
Total
2
12
2
12
Total number of households improved: 11
Profile of households improved:
- Women headed households (Saithwar community): 03
- SC households: Not applicable
- Minority households: 8
Number of HHs improved because of SHG-micro credit activities: 03
Number of HHs improved because of SHG-micro credit with agricultural/activities: 08
Number improved because of agricultural activities alone: Nil
Number improved because of other factors: Nil
Total number of persons deteriorated: 1
No. deteriorated because of failure of activities initiated with group loan Nil
No. deteriorated because of failure of other GEAG activities Nil
No. deteriorated because of other reasons 1 (Dowry)
Source: GEAG, 2004, Wealth ranking exercise with Peerbaba SHG formed by Gorakhpur Environment Action Group, in Tenua Vishambharpur SHG 2004 (mimeo),
REFERENCE
MURTHY, forthcoming, Toolkit for Participatory and Gender Aware Evaluation Methods, Indian Social Studies Trust, New Delhi
-
-
Thanks Saeid. This will be with a group who have not had prior experience with these forms of assessments nor any experience with NGOs etc.Judith
Saeid Nouri Neshat said:In a community-based poverty reduction project in Iran, where I was involved as a trainer/facilitator (and not in an evaluation team), I found that the focus of the participatory evaluation was on the capacities of the community group. The group had to have enough capacity to continue and deal with poverty issues in their own community. They used FGD with certain questions (I do not have the questions) and with participation of all group members and some of the community members. I do not have more information.
-
-
Dear Dr , Thanks for the tip. The villages dont have prior experience with NGOs so I guess even less information on SHGSs. But I think there is the potential to use the per capita expenditure and will see how to tweak it in.
Judith
Dr. SRIDHAR SEETHARAMAN said:Respected Group Colleague,
Glad to know that you are undertaking a poverty assessment survey of villages dominated by Self Help Groups. One of the quickest measure of Poverty Assessment has been the Per Capita Expenditure Pattern in a family and then grade them. This is the fastest measure that we have today and would enable one to know also where the expenditure is flowing. Any further clarification, if needed, could be provided. Wishing you the best of luck in your research.
Sridhar.
-
-
Thanks Pramod.
Pramod Sharma said:Dear Members,
Greetings!
Participatory methods are good as other members have said.
Poverty ranking or wealth ranking can be done in villages with different groups or with 4-5 key informants.
Household survey is also an option. I have found some material during my search on internet. which I am sharing with you.
In my opinion, Combination of a survey with participatory wealth ranking is a good.
In participatory methods many times people (group) care too much about person's historic background and other social factors.
Regards,
Pramod
-
-
Thanks Joseph. Will keep this in mind when developing the tools
Judith
Joseph Robert BUGEMBE said:Depending on your specific poverty info needs p'se remember to capture data using the 4 categories of PRA tools useful for participatory poverty assessment - tools for Spatial Analysis [access to resources and services]; Time trend Analysis [determine the variables to subject to analysis and the time frame(s) within which comparisons will be made]; Relational Analysis [e.g. the relative importance and relationships between and among institutions, livelihood strategies, etc]; and Priority Analysis [of needs, challenges and actions/interventions etc]...
© 2026 Created by Rituu B Nanda.
Powered by
