Monthly Corner

Astha Ramaiya [Co-author] Shared the Journal Article - Published in Child Abuse & Neglect, June 2026

A new systematic review published in Child Abuse & Neglect examined the link between mental health and technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse (TF-CSEA). Analysing 10 studies with over 25,000 participants across seven countries, researchers found that depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and prior trauma were consistently associated with victimisation. Crucially, the relationship appears bidirectional with mental health difficulties both preceding and resulting from exploitation; creating potential cycles of repeated harm. Perhaps most striking: traditional parental monitoring through technological surveillance showed limited protective effects. What actually mattered? The quality of parent-child relationships including, open communication, emotional warmth, and trust. The findings suggest prevention efforts should combine universal school-based programmes building emotional resilience with targeted support for high-risk youth, while parent education should prioritise connection over control. With 12.5% of children globally experiencing online solicitation annually, understanding these psychological pathways is essential for effective child protection.

Alok Srivastava, Vasanti Rao & Amita Puri Article on International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, January 2026

Tara Prasad Article on Challanges and Lessons Learns of GESI responsive and inclusive conservatiom practices, Nepal

Ritu Dewan & Swati Raju Article on Economic and Political Weekly

Viera Schioppetto shared Thesis on Gender Approach in Development Projects

Events

Vacancies

  • Seeking Senior Analyst - IPE Global

About the job

IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.

Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.

Role Overview

IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.

More Details Please go through

Members

Gender/equity sensitive indicators

Dear All

I am enclosing a recent powerpoint that I to facilitate a half day session on gender/equity sensitive indicators with a group of NGOs from Sri Lanka and Tamil Nadu indicators.ppt. 

Often NGOs, government and at times even evaluation teams get stuck at monitoring process or output indicators, and do not adequately evaluate outcome and impact indicators. The challenge remains  to identify appropriate outcome and impact indicators which are not only gender sensitive but also sensitive to other aspects of diversity. 

Would love to hear your views, as well as experienced in experiences in getting government & government commissioned evaluations to move towards gender/diversity and outcome & impact indicators 

Best 

Ranjani.K.Murthy

Views: 377

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of Gender and Evaluation to add comments!

Join Gender and Evaluation

Comment by Ranjani K.Murthy on March 6, 2014 at 14:23

Dear Susmita

Nice to get words of encouragement

The last slide - I normally give it as handout (translate where necessary) to groups and ask them to identify which kind of indicator each one is- input, process, output, process or impact

Do use it, adapt it and let me know me know how it went

best

Ranjani.   

Best 

Ranjani

Comment by susmita mukherjee on March 6, 2014 at 11:13

hi! i like it. specially the last two slides are really great.
best
Sushmita

Comment by Ranjani K.Murthy on March 5, 2014 at 13:59

Thank me when you use it and it works for you or the participants 

Comment by Shraddha Chigateri on March 5, 2014 at 12:20

Thanks for sharing Ranjani, very useful, especially the slide where you list different types of indicators along a project/evaluation process.

Comment by Maggie Schmeitz on March 4, 2014 at 17:53

You are welcome! Keep up the good work :)

Comment by Ranjani K.Murthy on March 4, 2014 at 9:58

Dear Maggie 

Thanks so much for your comments. I use the last slide in small groups and ask them to identify whether the five gender-sensitive indicators are input, process, output, outcome or impact indicators.  It think for participants who are experienced this exercise could be tweeked a bit to clarify the concept of five kind of indicators as well as gender blind to gender transformative indicators. I will add an explanatory slide!. Thanks again. Ranjani  

Comment by Maggie Schmeitz on March 3, 2014 at 20:07

Thank you Ranjani, very good presentation to get people on the right track! Especially the differentiation in types of indicators [slide 4] is very helpful. I think it would be nice to continue that same differentiation in criteria for indicators [slide 5 and 6]. Because number of applicants might not be a good outcome indicator but it might be a good process indicator. I like how you included inequalities within the gender domain [slide 7]. I am very curious how you explained slide 8 [from gender blind to gender transformative], I find this always a challenging part. Especially so if the person doing the monitoring and evaluation is not that gender-sensitive. And ofcourse I am even more curious to what exercise belonged with slide 9! Did they have to judge the examples? Hope to hear more from you, thanks again for sharing, Greets, Maggie

Comment by Ranjani K.Murthy on March 3, 2014 at 15:20

Dear Anita, 

I am sorry I do not follow. If I click on the indicators ppt I am able to open the ppt It takes about a minute to open

Best 

Ranjani

 

Comment by Anita Rego on March 3, 2014 at 14:54

Dear Rajana,

Thanks a lot for the ppt.  I think there are hyperlinks which have not been attached.  Could you please help us out. 

© 2026   Created by Rituu B Nanda.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service