Monthly Corner

Francois Iradukunda and Et.al., M& E Tool - User Guide

Laura Gagliardone - [EEAP Webinar 13] Summary Notes and Recording - AI and Evaluation of Energy Programs and Policies

DN News Liberia Article, By - Sir-George S Tengbeh

NIITI Consulting - Blog

Independent Evaluation ADB - Publication

Alok Srivastava - Blog

Feminist Policy Collective 

The India Gender Report – the first of its kind – is conceived and envisaged in the context of the many gendered rights that are enshrined in the Constitution of India. The endeavour is to examine myriad essential aspects of the gendered economic, extra-economic and non-economic status perceived from the prism of transformative feminist finance in order to demystify the enabler and simultaneously the de-enabler role of the Macro-Patriarchal State. Each of the 26 chapters, which interlink academics, analysis, advocacy and action, indicate four universal processes across all sectors and sub-sectors: the reinforcement of gender de-equalisation; the intensification of patriarchal rigidities; the deepening of economic and extra-economic divides; the increased exclusion of vulnerable and marginalised groups.
Lead Anchor: Ritu Dewan with Swati Raju

Software for Qualitative Data Analysis: A Good Servant or a Bad Master

Event Details

Software for Qualitative Data Analysis: A Good Servant or a Bad Master

Time: May 6, 2021 from 6pm to 7:15pm
Location: "6 pm Indian Standard Time"
Event Type: online, workshop
Organized By: ISST and Gender and Evaluation community
Latest Activity: May 6, 2021

Export to Outlook or iCal (.ics)

Event Description

As the M&E community stretches to meet the demand for evidence, one question is whether or not to use software to analyse qualitative data generated from observations, interviews and focus group discussions. A related question is which software to use. But other equally critical questions include: how to ally methodological approaches to evaluation with the software choice, how best to work in a team environment. In my talk I would address these questions and discuss 3 popularly used qualitative software programmes from my perspective as a user: NVivo, Atlas-ti, MaxQDA. My use of each of these programmes on big data-sets has led me to assess them from a perspective of software and hardware, and I hope my insights will spare other would-be users some future angst.
Melita Vaz holds a doctoral degree from the University of Michigan Ann Arbor which empowered and diverted her career track from its origins in clinical service delivery and program management to research, monitoring and evaluation. Self-designated as a data elf with gifts for quantitative and qualitative research methods she is struggling with a Pandemic obsession to learn Python. Though based in the private sector in Mumbai city, she maintains professional ties with various universities through her training workshops for doctoral students related to research methodology and software. Her qualitative software journey has taken her for long visits to the isles of NVivo, Atlas-ti, and MaxQDA with a brief stop-over at QDA-Miner Lite. She has only taken a look at tourist brochures for Dedoose, and has plans for a trip to RQDA when travel conditions are favourable. 
This workshop is for the members of Gender and Evaluation community. Please fill up the google form. 

Comment Wall

Add a Comment

RSVP for Software for Qualitative Data Analysis: A Good Servant or a Bad Master to add comments!

Join Gender and Evaluation

Attending (28)

Might attend (8)

© 2024   Created by Rituu B Nanda.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service