Monthly Corner

Astha Ramaiya [Co-author] Shared the Journal Article - Published in Child Abuse & Neglect, June 2026

A new systematic review published in Child Abuse & Neglect examined the link between mental health and technology-facilitated child sexual exploitation and abuse (TF-CSEA). Analysing 10 studies with over 25,000 participants across seven countries, researchers found that depression, anxiety, low self-esteem, and prior trauma were consistently associated with victimisation. Crucially, the relationship appears bidirectional with mental health difficulties both preceding and resulting from exploitation; creating potential cycles of repeated harm. Perhaps most striking: traditional parental monitoring through technological surveillance showed limited protective effects. What actually mattered? The quality of parent-child relationships including, open communication, emotional warmth, and trust. The findings suggest prevention efforts should combine universal school-based programmes building emotional resilience with targeted support for high-risk youth, while parent education should prioritise connection over control. With 12.5% of children globally experiencing online solicitation annually, understanding these psychological pathways is essential for effective child protection.

Alok Srivastava, Vasanti Rao & Amita Puri Article on International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, January 2026

Tara Prasad Article on Challanges and Lessons Learns of GESI responsive and inclusive conservatiom practices, Nepal

Ritu Dewan & Swati Raju Article on Economic and Political Weekly

Viera Schioppetto shared Thesis on Gender Approach in Development Projects

Vacancies

  • Seeking Senior Analyst - IPE Global

About the job

IPE Global Ltd. is a multi-disciplinary development sector consulting firm offering a range of integrated, innovative and high-quality services across several sectors and practices. We offer end-to-end consulting and project implementation services in the areas of Social and Economic Empowerment, Education and Skill Development, Public Health, Nutrition, WASH, Urban and Infrastructure Development, Private Sector Development, among others.

Over the last 26 years, IPE Global has successfully implemented over 1,200 projects in more than 100 countries. The group is headquartered in New Delhi, India with five international offices in United Kingdom, Kenya, Ethiopia, Philippines and Bangladesh. We partner with multilateral, bilateral, governments, corporates and not-for-profit entities in anchoring development agenda for sustained and equitable growth. We strive to create an enabling environment for path-breaking social and policy reforms that contribute to sustainable development.

Role Overview

IPE Global is seeking a motivated Senior Analyst – Low Carbon Pathways to strengthen and grow its Climate Change and Sustainability practice. The role will contribute to business development, program management, research, and technical delivery across climate mitigation, carbon markets, and energy transition. This position provides exceptional exposure to global climate policy, finance, and technology, working with a team of high-performing professionals and in collaboration with donors, foundations, research institutions, and public agencies.

More Details Please go through

Dear colleagues, I am seeking to get insight into how to measure/evaluate behavioural change in response to a capacity building intervention in the agriculture sector.  I would be grateful if someone could please share with me your thoughts on the topic. I look forward to hearing from you.

Views: 704

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Kaleab,

One approach which has worked in my experience is outcome harvesting. Outcome harvesting is a monitoring and evaluation methodology used to identify, describe, verify and analyse the changes brought about through a development intervention. It is designed to collect evidence of change, and then work backwards to assess contribution to that change.

I also facilitate behaviour change  using SALT approach and have worked in Bangladesh with fishing and farming community.

Best wishes

Thank you for your reply, Rituu. It is really helpful.

I do usually use the before - after questionnaire based on the topics covered in any workshop/capacity building initiative. In case it is done already then would have mailed across a simple format with questions on the topics covered to the participants; with a column to address  the source of  such knowledge. This sample study then could be extrapolated during report writing. 

Thanks Anirban for pointing out a research/an evaluation design to measure the effect of capacity building interventions.

Dear Kaleab,

Indeed, outcome harvesting is focusing on behavioural change. Alternative approaches include 'Positive Deviation', 'Most Significant Change' and 'Causal Link Monitoring', and 'Outcome mapping' as a forward looking tool that supports the monitoring of behavioural change.

All of these are explained on better evaluation.org and I am happy to arrange a meeting if you want to discuss on the best fit for your particular case/project.

Thanks Michael, I would love to hear more from you about the alternative approaches. I will inbox you. 

All above are good and in my opinion surveys are good for checking changes in behaviour. Comparison of own views and other’s views in relation to countable changes (eg. Increase in yield, or less chemical use or whatever was the objective of your project). If you can do FGDs, do it wherever is applicable.

Thanks Parmod for letting me know about the methods of data collection during measuring behavioural change.

Generally agricultural projects are focused on training farmers or extension workers on improved farming practices. You can look at increased knowledge of better farming practices and adoption of recommended practices including seeds, pest management, fertilizer application and post harvest management. Please read E.M. Roger book on innovation adoption. I can help you with more insight if you could tell me about the project. Hope this is useful as of now.

It is really helpful Shankar. The capacity building programme I am referring involves training farmers (globally) on sustainable use of mineral fertilisers,  pesticides, and water resources. What would you suggest as the top three methods to gauge behavioural change attributed to the training?   

Surveys have been used extensively to assess knowledge and adoption of improved farming practices. You can include qualitative methods also to know more about why, how, etc. I have done several such studies - Adoption of Good Agricultural Practices while working with TechnoServe.

The behavior change can be observed by a researcher or self-reported by the participants on questionnaires. Willingness or intent is usually measured through questionnaires. Actual behavior (e.g. not willingness or intent to take an action) is measured through direct observation or self-reports.
Field observations can occur in numerous ways, but windshield surveys and GIS are commonly used. One may also depend upon secondary data collected from various sources.
You may take into account new technologies, farming methods, strategies being adopted, linkages built and resources explored by the target group in response to the capacity building intervention in the agriculture sector.

RSS

© 2026   Created by Rituu B Nanda.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service